Discussion: GOP Whip: 'Ludicrous' To Think I Was Involved With White Nationalists

Discussion for article #231529

I was ready to forgive the whole lending-legitimacy-to-white-supremecists thing, but really, the League of Women Voters? Holy crap! Thatā€™s going too far, and you know heā€™s ashamed of speaking in front of that hate group because the memory still burns in his mind.

15 Likes

Steve Scalise : Iā€™m not a racist; Iā€™m just fucking clueless.

14 Likes

Right. To equate the League of Women Votersā€“an organization that has organized presidential debates!!ā€“as an extremist group on par with a David Duke-obsessed group is insulting at best, disingenuous at worst.

22 Likes

ā€œHow do you not know? How do you not investigate?ā€ Erickson wrote.
ā€œBy 2002, everybody knew Duke was still the man he had claimed not to be. EVERYBODY.ā€

EURO = ā€˜I canā€™t recall.ā€™
LoWV = ā€˜Godless Liberal hate group.ā€™

Courting the (R)acist voter has consequences Rep Scalise.
Now all your dreams worst nightmares are coming true back to haunt you.

jw1

8 Likes

You spoke in front of this group. To say you didnā€™t know what kind of people they were is unbelievable to the point of Marvel Comics-style fantasy. So you WERE involved with white nationalists, Mr. Scalise, and that was exactly your intention.

8 Likes

Why would a guy who was traveling around Louisiana campaigning against HUD funds being used to help ā€œthose peopleā€ want to get involved with a bunch of racists? Theyā€™d steal all his best lines!

13 Likes

It was nice of him to speak to the League of Women Voters. It didnā€™t go over well when he asked a volunteer from the audience to make him a sandwich, but points for effort.

11 Likes

Because being proved to have been involved with white supremacists isnā€™t the same as being ā€œinvolvedā€ involved!

3 Likes

"I spoke to the League of Women Voters, a pretty liberal group. ā€¦

Wait, hold onā€¦

Is this guy really comparing a NONPARTISAN group that encourages ALL women to take a larger part in public affairs to one that espouses hate, division and separation of other races??? Neo-Nazis??? One that suggests Israel bombed the World Trade Center?

This is unreal.

11 Likes

oops. He voted against MLK day in Louisiana in 2004. One of only 6 that voted NO out of 96 in the State Legislature.

How will he explain that away ?

Dripā€¦Dripā€¦Drip.

10 Likes

Also ludicrous to believe that Caribou Barbie was involved with creepy secessionists just because she spoke at the AIP convention and her husband was registered as a member for seven years.

8 Likes

Scalise must not realize that there are three groups you never piss off: The Junior League, the Garden Club and the League of Women Voters

3 Likes

Scalise: "It depends on what you mean by ā€œinvolved.ā€

3 Likes

Perhaps Scalise was part of Dukeā€™s Catholic outreach?

This note about KKK under Duke from Wikipedia:

Duke also reformed the organization, promoting nonviolence and legality, and, for the first time in the Klanā€™s history, women were accepted as equal members and Catholics were encouraged to apply for membership.

1 Like

From a 1999 article in Roll Call:

Another potential candidate, state Rep. Steve Scalise (R), said he embraces many of the same ā€œconservativeā€ views as Duke, but is far more viable.

ā€œThe novelty of David Duke has worn off,ā€ said Scalise. ā€œThe voters in this district are smart enough to realize that they need to get behind someone who not only believes in the issues they care about, but also can get elected. Duke has proven that he canā€™t get elected, and thatā€™s the first and most important thing.ā€

http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/scalise-vitter-talked-to-roll-call-about-david-duke-in-1999/

11 Likes

That alone should answer your question!

2 Likes

Thank you for this very pertinent info. It shows that he did endorse many of Dukeā€™s ideas as well as the fact that he was quite familiar with him.

5 Likes

I wish you people would stop calling them ā€œwhite nationalistsā€ or ā€œwhite supremacists.ā€ They are the base and we should respect them as such!

3 Likes

More like, ludicrous, not too!

1 Like