But you’re going to get $2. more in SS payments beginning January. The safety net holds!
Where they ’ poke ’ him … in the eye — ![]()
Wilbur? WTF?
MD like CA, OR and any other state that voted for Clinton is going to be punished for doing so by eliminating SALT deductions, per the Senate bill.
Still trying to figure out if some republicans are so stupid that they will continue to vote for republicans knowing what it means for them down the road. I read those opinions, and I’m not convinced.
Putting country over party? More like poking the Donald in eye.
But definitely not Hors d’oeuvres
There are some CA R critters in districts which went for Clinton who might be out of a job, Issa’s at the top of the list, unfortunately Nunes is deemed to be safe.
Best way for that is to vote no on the tax bill …
$100 … doesn’t quite do it … IMHO —
Nunes is not safe for other reasons.
Also, we haven’t seen the final version of the Senate bill. Even reading earlier commentary doesn’t help.
Yep. That’s ok, we will fight back, and win.
Alternatively, Flake could not have supported PP’s agenda 92% of the time.
Point being this is just another volley in the ongoing Flake-Trump feud. It has little to do with putting the country first.
He’s going to run again and win.
If a critter can hang to his seat by being an ass kissing dumbest guy in the House toady, he’ll be re-elected in a walk.
Flake’s going to run again? Six years from now?
As an independent?
There’s not a good record on those senators who repackage themselves as Independents for convenience sake except for Lieberman but not Specter, which was a chutzpah move.
Murkowski?
Anyway, nothing at all would surprise me any more. Republicans see what works and then chomp on it like hungry pigs. 
Still doesn’t excuse you voting for that horrible tax bill, Jeff. I’m not impressed.