Discussion for article #234108
Maybe she shouldâŚI donât knowâŚinform the Supreme Court that she no longer supports the lawsuit.
These people are like the folks in Union Busting states who see no problem working at companies with unions that fight for their rights and benefitsâand then bitching about âunion thugs.â Leeches.
They benefit from ACA and then bitch about it because thatâs what their manly pal-states do.
Flexiblity? Make a proposal! The law allows us to be flexible. â Obama
I donât have a proposal, but I want more flexibility! And freedom! â Typical GOP teahat
There is a cause and effect relationship with removing millions of people off of health insurance.
That even Chuck Todd canât gloss over.
After allâŚâMeatâ The Press canât give one-sided interviews with 11 million people.
The Governor also announced that Oklahoma will be setting up an account on GoFundMe to provide medical benefits to the poor in her state.
âWe hope that Congress would offer targeted, temporary relief for people to maintain their current coverage while we work together on free-market, consumer-friendly solutions for the future.â
Once more with feeling: âObamacareâ, the ACA, IS the conservative, free-market approach approach to healthcare. Anything less will not pass the test of affordability and long-term economic stability.
As of 2017, the ACA allows states to substitute their own system as long as it meets the coverage goals.
So why doesnât she suggest a new approach? If you want something in place in 2017, now is the time to start.
After all, they keep saying they have a âplanâ â a âmarket basedâ approach. And that means? Well, yâknow⌠a kind of markety basedy thing, done in a freedomish non-Obamalike American loving way. Yâknow.
Easy fix. Change one word in the law from âbyâ to âinâ and the entire lawsuit and problem goes away. But that would require the GOP controlled Congress to act like responsible adults and âfixâ the dreaded ACA (aka âObamacareâ) which is like committing political seppuku for the teahadist freaks that are the current GOP.
Not Chuck Toddâs job to gloss over cause and effect, or anything factual for that matter.
I think the entire Republican party is having a âbe careful what you wish forâ moment.
You said it for me! Thank You
Is she saying that she is FOR death panels?
Maybe she shouldâŚI donât knowâŚinform the Supreme Court that she no longer supports the lawsuit
You may be assuming that she is making a good faith argument. Most likely, she wants a soundbite so that she can say she didnât really want people to lose their insurance. That soundbite will get much more air time than the amicus brief.
Just word salad on her part. If any interviewer ever asked what flexibility she needs that the ACA doesnât already give, there would be at least 20 seconds of dead air while she gropes for a way to rephrase the complaint.
How naive she actually thinks that a Republican-led Congress can even come up with something workable, and that other Republicans even give a shit about people dying or losing everything for lack of insurance.
Oh, I know. Itâs the typical song and dance of âsound like youâre for the people while selling them out to the guys lining your pockets with greenbacks.â
She also supported Common Core. Clearly sheâs a closet liberal. [/s]
More Free market bullshit? Who do they think is selling the in-surance? The gubberment, of course.
Get that unread article published quickly, while the whole state is talking about frat shenanigans!
Mary Fallin: Right side of history*