Discussion: GOP Clerk Backtracks, Puts College Newspaper With Udall Story Back On Stands

TPM Article Topics
1

Discussion for article #229163

2

it would have funny had the newstand moved that stack of ‘offensive’ papers to a spot directly outside and 101 ft away from the polling station entrance…

3 Likes
3

There are a lot of stupid people in positions of power.

10 Likes
4

Every f^ckin’ ® aspires to be The Decider.

jw1

5 Likes
5

Bwahahahaha. Your crow…eat it.

3 Likes
6

UnIVersiTIEs are BREEding grouNDs FOr LIBtards wHO learn LAMEstream MEdia “Journalism” practice AND writE arTICLEs that ARe essENtiaLLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL eLEctionEEring for Other LIbtards ANd theIR ILK. STOP LIBTarderY. SToP UNCONSTITUTIONAL ELectionEERing. STOP HIgher LEARNING’s LITERALLY GnawING on AMerICA’s faBRIC!!!11!!!1one!!111!!!

6 Likes
7

And now this stupid, stupid woman is going to learn all about the Streisand Effect firsthand. Suits me. I’m sick unto death of self-righteous wingnuts’ censorship of anything they don’t agree with or approve of…

3 Likes
8

They never really left the stands. The Collegian and the Fort Collins Coloradoan were all set to sue.

All it takes is guts.

5 Likes
9

Isn’t that another term for tanning leather?

jw1

3 Likes
10

Republicans…the self proclaimed defenders of the Constitution. Which country’s Constitution is unknown, but they will defend it to the death.

2 Likes
11

Well to be fair, Jw…they only want ‘freedom of speech’ when they are the ones talking.

4 Likes
12

T’was always so.
Just that now it’s Open Mic Night in politics.

jw1

1 Like
13

And Nixon’s dirty tricks live on in the re-branded GOP.

3 Likes
14

Oh look, someone gave them a copy of the First Amendment.

2 Likes
15

"It’s the law that you’re not supposed to have NEWSPAPER ARTICLES ABOUT DEMOCRATS in that area, and I am the enforcer of that,” she said. FIFY.

1 Like
16

Level of Republican intelligence continues to plummet, apparently.

1 Like
17

Republicans: inventors of rat-fucking.

2 Likes
18

“Myers told the Collegian in a follow-up interview that the law was unclear in her eyes, but she would allow the newspaper to return to the racks.”

if she thinks the law is “unclear”, then the smart thing to do would be to request an opinion from the county’s legal counsel, that’s what they’re paid to do. she should have done this before voting started, not waited until she had her hand forced by a cease-and-desist letter. I suspect she was hoping no one would notice what she’d done.

1 Like
19

Oh, look YA Rethug who has zero understanding of the First Amendment. Quelle surprise…and good on the paper’s attorney for calling her on her censorship. To her credit, she was “protecting” a Democrat; wonder how that slipped by her? Guess Karl Rove didn’t have her on speed dial.