Discussion: GOP Candidate Doubles Down On Anti-Diversity Remark: Diversity Laws Are Dangerous

I realize that is a screen clip. But every time I see it, it looks like an exhibit from a natural history museum. The backdrop, the lighting and what is an oddly plastic and clay look to his complexion just sells the impression. I expect a pull back to see him discovering fire, burning the Constitution for warmth.

3 Likes

I think what’s best is that every other republic candidate in the country can be required to weigh in on his offensive remarks.

But wow. Not even some of his best friends, just some of his favorite restaurants.

3 Likes

Pandora’s Box had nothing on the box of racist, misogynistic, bigoted hate that Trump opened up. It was always there, but DAMN they’re happy to be out and free to spout their putrid bile.

6 Likes

Yeah, Seth, I have to agree. With those stupid diversity laws, look at all those non-Christians that are allowed in this country - and even afforded our precious right of free speech!

1 Like

No shit.

It’s been horrifyingly eye-opening.

2 Likes

I knew some of my cousins were in that box (a reason I don’t go to family Thanksgivings without seeing who’s going to be in town), but all these other people - jeeez.

Perhaps the mohels cut off a lot more than they were supposed to and now both of these putzes have inferiority complexes.

3 Likes

Seems like a reasonable explanation to me.

Forgive me if I’m wrong, because I know Judaism is at least matriarchal in the sense of you being considered Jewish if your mom is, etc. etc., but it’s not like the Jews have had a stellar history of equitable marriage relationships either. Just look at Abraham and David.

Better yet, look at Joseph…Mary was so afraid of him that she had to make up a story about magical no-sex pregnancy to avoid his wrath if she admitted it was the woodcutter’s son who delivered all of Joseph’s wood for his carpentry business. And look where THAT got us.

Abraham and David were married? Who knew?

1 Like

Bullshit from a dumbshit.

We don’t have to become Nazi Germany to avoid becoming Afghanistan.

2 Likes

Stop calling him a GOP Candidate.

He is a fucking NAZI CANDIDATE.

Words matter. Tell the truth.

1 Like

And THAT is how you retake control of the government.

3 Likes

They still exist. There is also a large Hispanic population working agriculture in the interior. Plenty of little Baptist and Nazarene churches, but I’ve also stumbled across a Buddhist Temple down there.

1 Like

Heh. I’m here to help. Speaking of, we got a donation of I.O.O.F applications from the 1940s-1960s and during the 50s and early 60s it asked if the applicant was of “White blood”. Stopped during the 60s but wasn’t there in the 40s. I guess the Civil Rights era was too much for them to bear. 23and Me would blow these racists minds!

MAGA

These cockroaches have never gone away, and like roaches, never will go away.

Trump just allowed them to burrow out of the cracks and the basement to think they have a voice, again.

We can only work to defeat them at the polls, and hope they die soon.

But not before they come to realization that white Americans have become a minority and not because of the food they eat, but because of the strength diversity brings to democracy.

1 Like

No, Seth Grossman is dangerous! . . . and Stupid! . . . and a disgrace to his own heritage! . . . and completely un-American! In general, he sounds like a pretty disgusting schmuck!

2 Likes

I took the restaurant comment as a way for him to say he likes “others” as long as they “know their proper place” - they serve him and not the other way around.

2 Likes

Interesting that he chose the Civil War as the turning point:

Prior to the mid-1800s, most legal systems implicitly accepted wife beating as a valid exercise of a husband’s authority over his wife.[73][74] One exception, however, was the 1641 Body of Liberties of the Massachusetts Bay colonists, which declared that a married woman should be “free from bodilie correction or stripes by her husband.”[75]

Political agitation during the 19th century led to changes in both popular opinion and legislation regarding domestic violence within the United Kingdom and the United States.[76][77] In 1850, Tennessee became the first state in the United States to explicitly outlaw wife beating.[78][79] Other states soon followed suit.[74][80]

In 1878, the Matrimonial Causes Act made it possible for women in the UK to seek separations from abusive husbands.[81] By the end of the 1870s, most courts in the United States were uniformly opposed to the right of husbands to physically discipline their wives.[82] By the early 20th century, it was common for the police to intervene in cases of domestic violence in the United States, but arrests remained rare.[83] Wife beating was made illegal in all states of the United States by 1920.[84][

Wikivf

2 Likes

Racism emptor!

Comments are now Members-Only
Join the discussion Free options available