What about Jews? Do they belong in Germany?
So Frauke Petry has political views nearly identical to those held by 60-70-80 million Americans. Sheâs described as a Nationalist.The U.S. is also loaded with nationalists. Once Trump is elected I guess the progroms can commence.
Senior members of Alternative for Germany cut short a meeting Monday with the Central Council of Muslims, accusing the group of failing to renounce religious beliefs that clash with the German constitution.
Can you imagine if something like that passed here? Weâd have to kick out most white Evangelicals.
Party co-leader Frauke Petry told reporters that âIslam, the way it is mostly practiced, doesnât belong in a democratic Germany.â
Replace the word âIslamâ with âJudaismâ and you see what Iâve done there.
Trump: I love my homeland.
Ein Reich! Ein Volk! Ein Fuehrer!
That would be horrible! Waitâwhat did you say? /s
I hate to go all Godwin so early, but havenât we been here before?
https://deutschesreichforever.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/antisemitismus.jpg?w=295&h=172
Yes, Jews belong in Germany, You only need one scapegoat at a time in Europe, America is different we need multiple groups to blame our flaccid member on, why I donât know, it is just the way it works. Lifeâs mysteries.
Its now well established Goodwinâs blanket statement was in error, it is in the internet equivalent of a trash heap.
Letâs not forget about the problem of decadent art. Trumpâs living room in the Trump plaza is the model of esthetics for the patriot.
Trump1932!
We need a comment from Trump. We need it to coordinate with Bernie voters**. We need a comment from Bernie to synchronize the outrage.
** âWeâll lay out and not vote. Trump wins. The revolution will be around the corner. The Germans will help. Itâll be amazingâ
TeaBaggers derive their energy from championing local government. State government. County government. That was the way the South worked before the Civil War. Thatâs the way Reconstruction was defeated in the 1800s. Thatâs how the Republicansâ âSouthern Strategyâ operated in the 20th Century. It was always the local (white) heroes versus the big bad Federal (dictator) Government which came down with their pesky attempts to get the locals to âcomplyâ with Federal efforts in Civil Rights.
Trump is a fascist, as you correctly allude to here.
For Trump (as for Hitler), the GOP is now the Trump Party (same as the NSDAP was the Hitler Party). Names (like âRepublicanâ) are irrelevant. Policy is whatever he says. Ironically for the TeaBaggers, they are in the process of placing into power a person who is 180 degrees away from wanting âlocalâ control.
Unless âlocal controlâ=âTrump Controlâ
The Third Reich was under the control of one personâŚdoesnât sound TeaBaggery to me.
Seif Heil! Frau Petry.
Lets all break into a rousing chorus of âUber Alliesâ while we are at it.
And you certainly wouldnât want to replace either one with âevangelical christianityâ, now would youâŚ
Trump has his VP as soon as his crack team finds her long form birth certificate. âI have people that have been studying it and they cannot believe what theyâre finding,â Trump said an interview.
Well, sheâs a vile bitch isnât she?
Yes, my comment was meant to be tongue-in-cheek. However, it is not so much that Godwinâs statement is in error as it is that it has been grossly misinterpreted and misrepresented. âGodwinâs Lawâ was a simple observation about the probability that a lengthy UseNet discussion would eventually result in a Nazi comparison. Underlying Godwinâs statement was a caveat about trivializing Nazi comparisons. This led to a misprision that all Nazi comparisons were disqualifying. The version of âGodwinâs Lawâ favored by Nazis is, âif you call me a Nazi, you lose.â This was a long way from Godwinâs intent. The Nazis were truly nasty people and Nazi comparisons should be reserved for truly nasty people. But when Germans (or Americans) start pulling out the old Third Reich propaganda and just replacing âJudenâ with âMuslimenâ then it is definitely time for the Nazi comparisons to come out.