Assuming they have a strong marriage, this could be an attempt to mitigate the damage done to her when this all comes crumbling down. “My husband knew what was going on and the demons I battled, but as a loyal American my job was to keep Trump in line, blah blah blah”.
Oh, yeah, and then she’ll get a regular CNN slot…
No need to comment on stability when there is none.
I totally agree…I think she will jerk her thumb towards George and say ‘I’m with HIM!!!’
Just another ardent right-winger (he voted for Trump because Hillary was sooooo bad) flaunting his new found cred and celebrity because he is willing to say something negative about the worst human being ever elected to the presidency. Good for him I guess.
And the fact of the matter is, when it comes down to things we disagree about, we agree on most policy things.
In that case you’re an immoral monster, since she’s not only said she’s in agreement with Trump’s fascist policies but she’s vigorously defended them on countless occasions. If this is all just mercenary posturing and she doesn’t actually believe these things, then she should resign and say so, but she will already have helped cause immense damage.
It sounds to me like you’re another Republican who basically believes in the same things that Trump does but you have a problem with his uncouthness, which amounts to supporting the push for dictatorship but objecting to some of the cosmetics.
“If I had a nickel for everybody in Washington who disagrees with their spouse on something that happens in this town, I wouldn’t be on this podcast,” [George Conway] continued. “I’d be probably on a beach somewhere.”
There’s an image I could do without.
Maybe they lock their kids in cages instead of getting a babysitter?
[Trump’s tweets] have a corrosive effect, I think, over the medium-to-long term in the perceptions of the public on…how the system operates."
I’m sure he knows this is Trump’s entire purpose.
If that is her main purpose then she is an abject failure. Her alternative fact based comments, clarifications and excuses for all things Trump are the work of an enabler, not a disciplinarian.
Perhaps amoral instead???
The enemy of my enemy could theoretically be my friend, but no, uh-uh.
Immoral : “Depraved, referring to character, applies to one who voluntarily seeks evil and viciousness.”
Amoral means that he doesn’t care one way or the other, or doesn’t know the difference, whereas he just said he agrees with Kellyanne/Trump policies. Immoral works for me.
Yeah the bar is set pretty low there.