Discussion for article #237904
Maybe the resident shrink at fox, Ablow, will opine for us ?
Napolitano can feel his gig, putting legalistic bullshit on the pig that is Fox News bigotry, is evaporating beneath him. Look for him to even more aggressively seek the âitâs actually all just performance art wink winkâ gigs on things like Nightly Show. Rats off ship.
ACA wasnât about âstates rightsâ so Iâm not sure if Roberts is two different people.
To paraphrase, the Law works in mysterious ways.
FOX Movie of the Week, âThe 2 Faces of Johnâ.
Donât you mean StATes rIGHts!!!111!one!!
2ND AMendmeNT remediES to PROteCT our 10TH AMendmentS!1!1!one!!1!!!
Napolitano says heâs ânot gonna question the chief justiceâs motivationâ and then he goes on to do just that in a very defamatory way!!! Calling someone reprehensible is to question their motivation!! Napolitano sounds âlike two different people!!â Jackass hypocrite!!!
How many losses do you have to endure before realizing that the country is moving LEFT in a big way?
Your âLEFTâ is othersâ "JUSTICE."
CeNTer RIght COUntRY LIBtard. SCOTUS legISLATes FROM GAY MARRy, USURPing JEsUS.GEt OUT of YOUr Leftwing ECHO BUBBLE and JOIN reaL America!11!!1one!1!!!
What does states rights have to do with interpretation of a federal law? It factored in, but seems that States rights were why they ruled the way they did, otherwise it would be chaos for the states.
Justice JR finally grew a pairâŚ
Plus he doesnât want Scalia, Thomas and Alito to define his legacy in perpetuity.
The Obamacare ruling that federal exchanges can provide federal subsidies doesnât violate state rights.
Iâm not gonna question the chief justiceâs motivation â but it does sound like two different people," Napolitano said.
Surprised no Fox anchor asked the follow-up, âif the chief justice were two people, would they be allow to marry each other?â
try homophobia and not being on âteh gayâsâ payroll.