Discussion for article #236016
He’s such a freaking embarrassment to the psychiatric community.
Jesus dude, why don’t you just advocate to make a woman a man’s property?
What an ass.
And women should have veto power over men not getting their testicles removed.
Nothing this guy says could possibly have any intere
Just how many months is it until the next election? 18? And the sludge is already this deep?
Do they wrap this guy in cotton and store him in a box between appearances?
“a man should have the right to compel his female partner to take a pregnancy to term if he’s willing to take full responsibility for their child after he or she is born.”
One glaring problem: ANYONE WHO WOULD DO THAT TO A WOMAN IS PRECISELY THE KIND OF PERSON WE DON’T WANT RAISING CHILDREN.
He and Charles Krauthammer both.
Faux needs a psychiatrist alright; just not this one. Put the whole mess of them on the fucking couch.
“Why would a woman’s right to decide what to do with a frozen embryo trump a man’s right every time?”
I’m pretty sure…correct me if I’m wrong…but that’s an abysmal misstatement of what’s going on there. I’m not a reproductive rights lawyer, but I have to imagine that the rule of thumb being applied here is that the person who doesn’t want to reproduce trumps the person who does. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s literally int he contracts they signed when they created the embryos.
“I don’t know that those consequences are greater than those suffered by men forced to end the lives of their unborn children.”
Yeah, nothing damages a man’s psyche like some uppity broad not knowing her place, giving him backtalk and failing to obey.
Seriously…you’d think they’d have come up with a diagnosis for him by now.
The only thing that should be vetoed is your mouth, Assistant Clinical Professor Dickhead.
Boy, I’ll say!
Ablow seem totally ignorant of the fact that there are possible medical complications of a pregnancy, some quite severe, and such a man would not have to face them while he’s forcing an unwanted pregnancy on his ex-wife/girlfriend. Even a psychiatrist learns something about pregnancy in medical school.
“Everyone knows a woman is just a life support system for…”…oh wait, that’s just a really bad dirty joke the wing nuts believe as some form of ideology (er, idiot-ology).
We signed a form stating that any embryos created through the process could be brought to term only with both parties’ consent. The form did not specify — as California law requires — what would happen if we separated.
Seems like he’s splitting legal hairs. If the document specifies that both parties must consent if they’re a couple, isn’t it clear that they’d have to consent if they separated?
And “Dr.” Ablow, just go the f away.
“I think men should be able to veto women’s abortions if they’re willing to care for the child after it’s born.”
Well, that’s darn white of you, sport. Tell me, what happens if the man reneges on that willingness? Will he go to jail? What happens if he dies? Is the kid up for a retro-bortion?
Go to a Mickey D’s
And while ordering your coffee, turn around and check out the TV (tuned to FOX, of course).
And watch the little old ladies and gents (who look just at home at the Bingo Parlor or Square dance) as they wallow in the filth FOX puts out.
They look just so harmless…until it is realized that their voting prowess knocks out all of the legions of supposedly more “intelligent” and “sensible” people.
“premier men’s rights activist”? I think you misspelled “misogynistic asshole.” He is indeed an embarrassment, not just to the psychiatric profession, but to the human race. Thanks, Fox, for foisting off another “expert” on us. I’m so glad I never waste a minute of my precious time watching this drivel, and thanks to the intrepid reporters at TPM for uncovering this human waste.