The question here shouldnât be whether or not Rosenstein should be fired, but whether or not Rosenstein is right.
Truth hurt, Ingraham Cracker?
Wait we are suppose to believe this nyt story but donât believe the ones that paint trump in a negative light?
this â
Josh Barro
â@jbarro
If the sources are people trying to get Trump to give Rosenstein the shove, why would they do that before the election (when the firing would hurt Trump politically) instead of after? I guess âtheyâre not smartâ is possible. Or â itâs a Rosenstein foe who isnât a Trump ally.
Correct, itâs only fake news when the storyline is inconvenient.
Do not like the endgames that this leads to for the Mueller probe. Would much much rather see Rosenstein remain until it wraps up!
Fox is the only news agency in the world where Ingaham would not be fired from.
Itâs her happy place where she will never be fired for being stupid and wrong.
Eva Braunoser elbows her way into the FĂźhrerbunker.
First, Hannity, and now, Laura.
Fox News is now governing?
SoâŚitâs all âfake newsâ until they want to BELIEVE it? Hypocrite much, Lady Laura?
Trump wonât know about the ny times article claim until he sees it on fox.
He wonât listen to her ⌠not near respectful enough âŚ
She forgot the salute â
An Ingraham Cracker, a marshmallow, and a dog turd: itâs called a Sâless instead of a Sâmore.
But she jettisoned her non ecru children to get past the guard at the door.
Since Nov. 9th, 2016.
Sheâs a Smarty!
Or something is coming out soon and this is in preparation for that, or a excuse to fire him to try to stop it from coming.
I thought conserative didnât believe stuff they read in the NYT?