Discussion for article #226822
No, itâs not.
According to Fox Not the News it is. They are touchy. They think âmeatpuppetâ is an insult, not a description of Brian Kilmeade
Calling someone an âunarmed teenâ is simply calling someone an âunarmed teenâ. There is nothing further you can possibly read into it.
⌠puts on Fox News hat âŚ
Well, I guess you can assume the person is not a true american tea party patriot, otherwise they would have been white and armed. So it must be playing the race card.
Such is the state of affairs that the assumption is that as a black kid in America, he was armed unless proven otherwise.
If Brown was white, do you think anyone would be using that adjective?
Clearly, in order to avoid âplaying the race cardâ and âpicking a side,â the media should refer to Brown as a âhulking, menacing sub-human drug-crazed Thug who forfeited his right to live by failing to instantly drop to the ground lie face down with his hand behind his head as soon as a police officer looked in his direction.â Those People bring these things on themselves by their failure to do that.
He was a teenager with no weapon. He was an unarmed teenager.
BREAKING: LIBERALS LIE ABOUT MICHAEL BROWN. CLAIM HE HAD NO ARMS.
Pray tell, then, what size (or ethnicity) does have an unarmed person have to be before it becomes permissible to describe him or her as âunarmedââor, for that matter, before it becomes impermissible for the police to shoot him or her six times?
Correct me if I am wrong but wasnât he an unarmed African American teen who was shot by a white cop? Is this yet another instance of reality having a liberal bias?
Was he unarmed?
Yes.
Was he a teenager?
Yes.
Clearly using FACTS is playing the RACE CARD.
He wasnât an âunarmed teqanager.â He was an âunarmed black man,â thereby making everything A-OK.
He was âan 18-year-old man who is six foot four and weighs almost three hundred pounds.â
Armed with Height and Blackness??? Youâre big, BANG.
I canât decide whoâs the bigger Twit this morning â Linda Chavez or Dr. Carson or just generic Republican?
Yes, if he was unarmed. No, if he was carrying a weapon.
Thatâs kinda how it works.
Hurry up and die, Roger Ailes! This channel is getting more racist by the millisecond!
The biggest twit is the person watching this segment, nodding in agreement without giving it a second thought.
To these people the color black is a weapon.
if Steve Douchy is the answer, the question is really effed up.
Thereâs no such thing as a ârace card,â itâs the same game that everyone else is forced to play, and some people have shitty cards.
I mean, theyâre tired of talking about it, but weâre tired of living it. Fuck their tired.
Well, the description âunarmed teenâ isnât Fox appropriate. The proper terminology in this situation would be âPotentially Armed, Massive Black Thugâ.