Discussion: Fox Contributor: Saying Michael Brown Was 'Unarmed' Is Misleading

Discussion for article #226822

No, it’s not.

10 Likes

According to Fox Not the News it is. They are touchy. They think ‘meatpuppet’ is an insult, not a description of Brian Kilmeade

6 Likes

Calling someone an “unarmed teen” is simply calling someone an “unarmed teen”. There is nothing further you can possibly read into it.

… puts on Fox News hat …

Well, I guess you can assume the person is not a true american tea party patriot, otherwise they would have been white and armed. So it must be playing the race card.

13 Likes

Such is the state of affairs that the assumption is that as a black kid in America, he was armed unless proven otherwise.

If Brown was white, do you think anyone would be using that adjective?

5 Likes

Clearly, in order to avoid “playing the race card” and “picking a side,” the media should refer to Brown as a “hulking, menacing sub-human drug-crazed Thug who forfeited his right to live by failing to instantly drop to the ground lie face down with his hand behind his head as soon as a police officer looked in his direction.” Those People bring these things on themselves by their failure to do that.

38 Likes

He was a teenager with no weapon. He was an unarmed teenager.

21 Likes

BREAKING: LIBERALS LIE ABOUT MICHAEL BROWN. CLAIM HE HAD NO ARMS.

35 Likes

Pray tell, then, what size (or ethnicity) does have an unarmed person have to be before it becomes permissible to describe him or her as “unarmed”–or, for that matter, before it becomes impermissible for the police to shoot him or her six times?

4 Likes

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn’t he an unarmed African American teen who was shot by a white cop? Is this yet another instance of reality having a liberal bias?

8 Likes

Was he unarmed?
Yes.
Was he a teenager?
Yes.
Clearly using FACTS is playing the RACE CARD.

9 Likes

He wasn’t an ‘unarmed teqanager.’ He was an ‘unarmed black man,’ thereby making everything A-OK.

13 Likes

He was “an 18-year-old man who is six foot four and weighs almost three hundred pounds.”

Armed with Height and Blackness??? You’re big, BANG.
I can’t decide who’s the bigger Twit this morning – Linda Chavez or Dr. Carson or just generic Republican?

14 Likes

Yes, if he was unarmed. No, if he was carrying a weapon.

That’s kinda how it works.

2 Likes

Hurry up and die, Roger Ailes! This channel is getting more racist by the millisecond!

3 Likes

The biggest twit is the person watching this segment, nodding in agreement without giving it a second thought.

3 Likes

To these people the color black is a weapon.

13 Likes

if Steve Douchy is the answer, the question is really effed up.

3 Likes

There’s no such thing as a “race card,” it’s the same game that everyone else is forced to play, and some people have shitty cards.

I mean, they’re tired of talking about it, but we’re tired of living it. Fuck their tired.

4 Likes

Well, the description “unarmed teen” isn’t Fox appropriate. The proper terminology in this situation would be “Potentially Armed, Massive Black Thug”.

3 Likes