Discussion for article #242419
“At some point, the Republican candidates are going to look weaselly and weak if they continue on this parade.”
Um, that ship has sailed. Bon Voyage.
Initial reports about the meeting from the Washington Post said campaigns didn’t want to anger Ailes, the Fox News chairman and CEO, and therefore the Nov. 10 debate on Fox Business would not be subject to the candidate demands.
“At some point, the Republican candidates are going to look weaselly and weak if they continue on this parade.”
The GOP clowns are well past this point.
At some point, the Republican candidates are going to look weaselly and weak
Yea, at some point…This guy’s a riot.
“Moderators should meet the specific criteria of fairness and balance.”
Yeah, and this from the mouthpiece for Faux News. Peter Johnson, much less Roger Ailes doesn’t know the meaning of “fair and balanced.”
“The more they get the more they want”.
This applies to spoiled children
CNBC…a “hard liberal network that is devoted and dedicated to taking down the Republican Party.”
Blotter acid would be my first guess…
CNBC is a hard-left network? Good grief, I do NOT want what this guy is smoking. It’s worse than bath salts.
“CNBC… the channel is a hard liberal network that is devoted and dedicated to taking down the
Republican Party.”
How can he say this about the midwife of the Tea Party? Unless he realizes that the Tea Party will kill the Republican party. Could he possibly be that self-aware?
ET phone home…
I think what he meant was, CNBC made them look bad. Therefore, CNBC is far-left liberal. Anything that makes a Republican look bad is, by definition, Islamosocialistcommunistfascistpoopyheadism.
If only he had…
(PS-I haven’t heard the word “devoted” since the old Act Up days…they only haul that one out for 3 alarms or more.)
he described it, the channel is a “hard liberal network that is devoted and dedicated to taking down the Republican Party.”
I just…wow, that is a startling level of delusion, even for Fox News
This is all about Fox News appointing itself as the only network sanctioned to run GOP presidential debates to boost their profits. The hopeful clowns have no choice but to read from the script.
Was going there-- but thought I’d grab the SpiceWeasel™ – and kickitupanotch!
And state that that particular rodent had already left the burrough.
jw1
““At some point, the Republican candidates are going to look weaselly and weak if they continue on this parade.””
Check your rearview mirror, Jethro.
These people passes weaselly and weak a long time ago. Acting like you’re being persecuted is part of the republican’s DNA.
Yeah, because that Rick Santelli fellow, he’s practically Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx rolled into one.
And don’t get me started on that Trotskyite Larry Kudlow!
"…the channel is a “hard liberal network that is devoted and dedicated to taking down the Republican Party.”
Except, you know, for its daily fellating of CEOs, hedge fund managers, billionaires, Wall Street, oh, and the fact that one of the questioners at the debate unleashed the rant that gave birth to the tea baggers. But other than those things, it’s clearly a hard left network.
What a maroon.