Discussion for article #239482
She’s right. What makes her unfit for office is her presumed entitlement status and her contempt for her “lessers.”
I wonder what her boobs look like.
“Can we think of a single instance in which a man’s hormones might have clouded his judgment?” … Her comments could be seen as a thinly veiled jab at fellow Republican candidate Donald Trump,”
No, I think it more likely she was referencing Bubba and the Knob Slobber incident.
That being said, I don’t want to dissuade you from continuing to push the narrative about Derpy Donald’s misogyny, so please proceed…
LOL…she had a double mastectomy…
Well, at least I’m not the only one with wildly inappropriate shit to say haha
We’ellll, I believe she’s had a mastectomy, Eustace; so unless you have a surgical scar fetish…
Are you sure it wasn’t a headectomy?
Ouch. That was pretty cold, Eustace.
Just giving into my baser male hormone thoughts.Had forgotten about the mastectomy though.
“I was asked on a national television program whether a woman’s hormones prevented her from serving in the Oval Office,”
I’m at a disadvantage. Who would have been crass and stupid enough to ask that question? Well, there is Don Lemmon, but never mind that. Is she making that up? I really don’t know.
I get the impression, that Carly is just throwing “quasi-feminist” stuff out there, hormones in this instance, to somehow prove that she’s some kind of conservative feminist alternative to Hillary that right-of-center and moderate Republican women can relate to. The GOP must be really convinced [and frightened] that Hillary can successfully tap into that demographic. Fiorina’s problem is that everything she says is redolent of an attitude of expediency.
But she’s right about men’s hormones and bad decisions. Don’t generally see too many women participating in sports riots.
She’s right but this is a straw man in this campaign. The issue was resolved, maybe, 30 years ago. She needs a raison d’être to run other than Hillary Hate and the politics of resentment.
Question for Fiorina: Did hormones have anything to do with your wrecking HP, or is it just that you were terrible at your job?
It is not hormones that disqualify you from office. It is that “R” after your name.
I am going to go with making it up. I have not heard of anybody posing such a loaded question to her in this campaign cycle or in her 2012 defeat.
Its the old saying, “Talk to yourself and you hear what you want to hear”. You also get to ask questions that you want to answer.
It’s not the hormones. It’s the demon sheep.
How about a history of failure with other people’s money? Does that disqualify?
Unfortunately it does not.
It was not “Hormones” that led Carly to destroy Lucent, then Hewlett Packard, then her own Senatorial Campaign.
It was incompetence.
She has “Failed Upward” her ENTIRE professional life, and tens of thousands of workers have paid for it (along with tens of thousands of investors.)
Politics is the “The last refuge of the Incompetent” and she is the poster child for it.
Hey, it’s your GOP conservative base which has a problem with a woman being in charge. Watch them come out of the woodwork with it regarding Hillary Clinton, which they have been doing for over two decades I might add.
Get your own party’s shit in order.
Men can be WORSE than hormonal — I know cause I are one ! —
Still like to know what this has to do with her campaign though —