This is a good example of legislating/governing based on biased assumptions rather than studying issues and crafting policies based on the research with clear goals.
Gov is the goal to get people who need treatment into treatment then it is an abject failure. Or Gov is the real goal to name and shame those in great need (most are receiving food assistance, not cash assistance) and if so - to what end - simply to humiliate and name/shame? Isn’t that a very costly way to demonstrate your misanthropy?
1 Like
Not to mention that the cost of such programs usually is more than if they just gave the benefits and cut the drug testing/screening.
1 Like