Discussion for article #228199
I’m still trying to figure out this MSM plagiarism thing. One network or outlet or bobblehead says some really stupid shit, pushes false equivalencies and a fabricated narrative by spinning everything to be all fair-y balance-y and so another one thinks it’s so great they have to borrow it? Couldn’t come up with their own vapid line of bullshit and hyper-sensational claptrap? Mind boggling. I mean, this shit writes itself half the time. I could eat a fistfull of shrooms and write a week’s worth of “news” in 6 hours flat, but these guys have to borrow from each others’ trips? It’s like they’re half-assing the rabbit hole. In or out, fuckers, make up your minds.
1 Like
This is a great dodge: We own all of our own words and sometimes other people’s, too. But if anybody tries to use our words, we will sue for infringement. The Elites have a different set of rules, methinks.
Please review the plagiarism of Doris Kearns Goodwin, the likes of which would expel any Harvard undergrad she might be teaching. For her, more fame & fortune.
“Stelter also noted that many TV scripts are written by producers.”
Well then, that should let the on-camera talent off the hook. It wasn’t me, it was the producers. Wah!