FBI Did Not Review Witnesses Suggested By Ramirez, Her Attorney Says
Well, of course not. That would imply that there was a real investigation being done. And we all know that this was not the case.
Well this all comes down to Murkowski. If she says “this is a sham” the gig is over, Flake and Collins will follow her lead. And it will cause Munchin to vote no.
OTOH if Collins votes Yes (because Murkowski does) then she is target #1 in 2020, and Gardner is target #2, with Jodi Earnst Being target #3, with this being the key vote used to take them down…
The second time as farce…
The backroom deals being made on this are countless - from Wray to Manchin to Collins to whoever, the real business going on here is all but invisible to us. All we get to see are the cover up lies and the results.
I wish it wasn’t this bad, but I am sure it is far worse than I can imagine.
Except Flake AND Collins already announced they were fully satisfied with the sham investigation the White House limited even though the White House said it was not limiting. Like over an hour ago they announced it. Both of them.
OOps. Sorry, you wrote this 2 hr ago. My bad.
Agents covered their ears and shouted “La la la la la I can’t HEAR you!!!”
Sigh. With Flake’s and Collins’ comments, this doesn’t sound good.
And a serious investigation might have, for example, uncovered “evidence”, which would only lead to more delay. And isn’t Ramirez a Spanish name?