So an Obama Democrat was behind everything that’s happened on the Mueller front in the last two years. I knew it.
They really are desperate to find a “both sides do it” example, aren’t they?
Hey, Hillary killed Vince Foster. So, there’s that.
Welp one bad Democrat, you know what that means: Both sides! BOTH SIDES!! I’m sure the media will play this up endlessly for weeks, especially the goons at Fox “News” with their commitment to being “fair and balanced” and all that…
“Ex-Obama WH Counsel To Be Indicted” falsely connects the Obama administration to this man’s alleged crimes. He was not part of the administration when the alleged incident took place and so the fact that he did at one time serve has no bearing on this news.
I understand why the MSM keeps using these headlines, but TPM should know better. Josh, this is sloppy journalism.
By the time the 2020 election season heats up Chuck Todd and Fox News will have the 47% of the voters Trump needs convinced Democrats and the DNC are a bunch of communists in league with the GRU.
Hey, Hillary killed Vince Foster. So, there’s that And…Seth Rich
Well now everything is headed in the direction in the reapers minds, just got to get obama and hillary indicted and the whole problem is solved.
Then trump can act like a rooster again.
In a breaking news alert, the NYT announces:
A former aide to President Obama is expected to be charged soon in a case that grew out of Robert Mueller’s Russia inquiry, lawyers said.
I can see the little wheels turning in weak minds.
WaPo reports:
In a statement, attorneys William W. Taylor III and William Murphy said they expect Craig, 74, will be indicted by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington at the request of the Justice Department’s national security division.
That could not be independently corroborated. Bill Miller, a spokesman for U.S. Attorney Jessie K. Liu of the District, said the office had no comment.
“Mr. Craig is not guilty of any charge,” Craig’s attorneys said in their statement.
…
In their statement Wednesday, Craig’s attorneys said his work on the ÂTymoshenko case came “as an independent expert on the rule of law, not as an advocate for the client” and that he refused requests to participate in Ukraine’s lobbying around the report.
They said Craig “did not lie to his former firm or the government” and said his contact with the New York Times was intended to ensure the newspaper accurately summarized the way the report criticized ÂTymoshenko’s trial.
There’s your witch hunt.
As if there was ever any doubt. /s
Thank you for this. I’ve been following this story which to me is emblematic of the AP’s terrible Orange spin these days.
How I miss the old AP. And UPI for that matter. I am an old. sigh 