Discussion: Evidence In Oregon Refuge Trial Includes 13,000 Photos, 6,000 Hours Of Video

And Gummy Dicks! Heavens to Betsy, do not forget the Gummy Dicks!

Where, oh where, is all the vocal support for these fearless patriots from Donald Trump and the GOP? I mean, aren’t these the kind of people that the GOP has been striving for since the reign of the McCarthyites during the 1950s?
Jeez, it’s almost like you’d have to blow up a federal building or accuse the President of being a foreign-born traitor to get some goddamned attention and respect.
Oh, wait…

1 Like

They traded their freedom for an armed tantrum. Paying the piper will take time. Lots of time.

2 Likes

Hard Time?

1 Like

I think it’s time, once again, for my favorite recap of the Malheur Refuge crime family.

The Ballad of the Malheur Patriots

6 Likes

A Brady violation. I listen to too many criminal justice podcasts these days…

Exactly.

2 Likes

And 5,000 Sex Toys.

2 Likes

There are big conceptual differences between OTOH the government prosecution in a criminal case showing the defendants the mass of evidence that the government side has gathered which MIGHT be used as evidence at the trial, whetehr by the prosecution or the defense or both, and OTOther what pieces from that pile each party ends up actually choosing to use in the trial.

Take the video(please): 6,000 hours of continuous time is over 8 months. The Bundy bunch occupied Malheur for 40 days, around 1,000 hours of continuous time.

If this trial were really about some great human cause, or some closely-defined yet vital claim to liberty under the Constitution, the attorneys and the presiding judg might have some compelling incentives to exclude irrelevancies. Even so, I can envision a case like this, most irrelevancies removed and issues pretty much boiled down to their essence, still taking 3 months, easily. That’s just owing to the realities and rhythms of the criminal trial process: there’s a story to be told here, and it has to be told in relation to each defendant.

But forget all that: this case is highly politicized, and from all I know of the attorneys involved on the defense side, they aren’t remotely experts, specialists, experienced, particularly trained or notably skilled at criminal trials generally, leave aside large volume discovery data criminal cases.

Long trials with huge masses of data pose unique logistical and psychological challenges to everyone involved in them. When I look at the names and backgrounds of the attorneys involved on the defense side, I don’t see ANYTHING to support that they’re at all capable of handling those challenges - even if they were to treat this trial as if it’s about legitimate legal issues.

If, however, the defense side really is more interested in engaging in gonzo court process and treating the entire exercise as political theater, I can see the sense in have at least some of these defending attorneys on the case.

This trial is very likely to be a white supremacist putz faux Blood Meridian stew of stupid, and a total fiasco.

2 Likes

13,000 photos, 6000 hours of video? Wow.

Y’all are fucked.

2 Likes

Man, I hope the broadcast the trial. It’s going to go down like the intro courtroom scene of Better Call Saul.

1 Like

Nah. If the prosecution had twenty-seven 8×10 color glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence against them, THEN they’d be fucked. :wink:

1 Like

I read as:

Defense attorney’s complain that the prosecution has too much evidence against their clients, who live video blogged their month of violating Federal law…

My heart bleeds…

5 Likes

Brilliant!

TPM:

Ammon Bundy’s new lawyer, Marcus Mumford, said that he was still trying to “get up to speed.”

Mumford continued, “I had no idea my client’s illegal activities and assholery were this extensively documented. I may move to have all the evidence barred at trial, since it’s all clearly prejudicial, in a fact-based manner, to my client.”

5 Likes

…and 8X10 glossies.

2 Likes

Any recollection of what the charges are?

The Bundies are just the sideshow. The main event is the Koch-funded movement to divest the US of federal public lands (BLM, NFS in particular). Here’s a rundown on the land-theft movement by state - and these initiatives are NOT supported by the majority of the citizens of any of the states:

Several state land-theft bills have been voted down, but they keep returning like zombies. Federal public lands are our legacy as US citizens and our loss would be enormous and irreversible.

1 Like

“6,000 hours of video, more than 13,000 photographs, up to 250,000 pages of Facebook account information and more than 40,000 pages of FBI reports.”

And how many bags of dicks and butt plugs?

1 Like

A horrible violation of Poe’sLaw! Just ree-eally fine.

-dlj.

Well, it’s not that that’s not going to happen. Exhibits A, B, C, and rest the case.

However, the defense does get to see everything that is in evidence, whether or not it’s presented at trial, in case there is anything in there that might help their case.