Discussion: ESPN Public Editor Criticizes Anchor's 'Error In Judgment'

And now we head to South Korea for the StarCraft II World Championship Series.

2 Likes

There’s no current issue about race and white supremacy that effects sports which would make the Tweet relevant. None at all. Nothing about a player kneeling during the national anthem and racist pushback. Good to know ESPN’s public editor is isolated from what’s going on in the world. Jeez.

8 Likes

Her ‘error in judgement’ might have been to use the company account. However, her comment that Trump is a white supremacist is not an ‘opinion’. It is a fact based on words from his own mouth. These were not ‘personal attacks’.

4 Likes

I’m waiting for them to cover more competitive eating. The Nathan’s yearly July 4th hot dog eating contest is not enough. We also need kids and youth divisions.

2 Likes

She used her personal Twitter account.

17 Likes

The Public Editor has a defensible argument for his position on Hill’s comments, but he gets into trouble on his claims on "ideological diversity’’. His comment suggests that we must accept bigotry into the mainstream of ideological discourse, and that issues of individual rights and equal treatment under the law are somehow ‘left’. They’re not. They’re American values. That the politics of one party has become hostile to those values doesn’t mean that ESPN should bow in deference and give it a platform. This is the kind of logic that CNN used to give Jeffrey Lord a platform.

16 Likes

The real significant point here is trump getting annoyed at someone who calls him a bigot and then using the power of his office to squash them like a bug. Problem being the first amendment’s proscription on the government (as in trump using his office’s power) doing that. He gets to abuse people but nobody gets to return the favor. As a private citizen he can be annoyed but he should never use his spokesperson or his office to demand the annoyer be fired. That is NOT his purview.

15 Likes

Yeah I agree. ESPN has managed to get itself involved in an important constitutional issue here. Obviously neither the president nor ESPN understand the first amendment and they need to.

17 Likes

She told the truth.

Meanwhile, the legalized killing of black Americans by white police officers continues. And that is just the tip of the iceberg of what has been happening to the African-American community in our country for decades.

No justice, no peace.

6 Likes

Exactly. There seems to be no acknowledgement that employees may have personal speech outside of their job with company. The question is how they have agreed to limit it when they signed their contract.

The “Public Editor” is talking about another issue, editorial balance – as if their anchor’s tweets were part of ESPN programming. But they aren’t. It is hard to imagine a more obtuse hot take on the issue than the Public Editor’s – but this is ESPN, I suppose.

12 Likes

Well, at least Twitter did not delete her account. They could have, you know.

1 Like

Awarded: One Internet.

9 Likes

It’s more than a First Amendment issue—President Littlefingers and his spokescreature Ma Hamhock have violated federal law.

Wrongfully influencing a private entity’s employment decisions by a Member of Congress or an officer or employee of the legislative or executive branch.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/227

8 Likes

Apparently they don’t want to lose the MAGA viewers and listeners.

6 Likes

Basically, he’s saying it’s ok but only if you have the “right politics”.

Yep.

5 Likes

I’m aware. And just because you used Littlefingers and Hamhock, doesn’t mean I didn’t call it first and I still get to use them too. hahahahahahahahaha

5 Likes

Well sure - they have apparently calculated that their audience is mostly white males.

5 Likes

WE should all be spreading those terms far and wide across the interwebs.

5 Likes

Well then FK 'EM.

2 Likes

Nope, racism and white supremacy have nothing to do with sports, never have. It’s all about the buoyancy.

4 Likes