Discussion for article #236634
And? I’m sure that there’s a point here aside from trying to tie the email “issue” to Benghazi!, right? It seems that we’re keeping with the standard AP policy of insinuating things without actually substantiating them, which is at least consistent I suppose.
1 Like
Speaking after a campaign stop in Iowa this week, Clinton urged the agency to make her emails public as quickly as possible.
WHAT IS SHE TRYING TO HIDE?!?
Oh, wait…
1 Like
When it comes to Hillary, when there’s smoke there’s a Republican smoke machine.
The two Blumenthal emails that I have see excerpted seem fine:
Blumenthal initially sent Clinton an email one day after the 2012 attacks that blamed them on “demonstrators … inspired by what many devout Libyans viewed as a sacrilegious internet video on the prophet Mohammed.” Clinton forwarded that email to Sullivan, her top foreign policy aide, calling it “more info.”
He sent a new memo the next day that told the secretary that “sensitive sources” believed it was actually a terrorist attack.
I’d expect any American with first hand or close contact information to pass it along. If the other 23 or so emails are of this nature then there is nothing here.
The only angle I could see that would be damaging is if there is anything that can be construed as improper between a lobbyist for Libyan businesses and the secretary of state