If any legal action were initiated as a result of the revelations in the leaked emails, would they even be permissible evidence? Asking for a friend.
This banana-republic-type activity has been sweeping the country, and it’s why we’re in the mess we’re in - a corrupt sector of the media helping the very rich in their undeclared (publicly) war against the rest of us.
As long as no one involved in the leak was involved in the legal action in question, I believe it would be admissible.
Disclaimer: Practicing law without a license is my third most favorite crime.
This finding was so predictable, yet still made me feel a bit ill.
So I want to know more about the “dancing around campaign finance rules” bit.
this is a story of corruption of the election process by tossing out the BS meme they will get all the fake outrage they can handle from their base who really don’t give a shit about facts just fear
Shameless, just shameless.
…used as an excuse by Republicans to promote a veiled agenda.
… a thinly-veiled agenda.
… an obvious and oppressive agenda.
Choose either. FIFY
Licensees of the public airwaves are engaged in a conspiracy with the Republican Party to deceive the public. All talk radio operators in WI should forfeit their licenses immediately, and the channels be assigned to honest individuals and organizations.