Discussion: Earnest 'Can't Imagine' Scenario Where Obama Would Pull Support For Garland

Discussion for article #247596

We know Paul Ryan wouldn’t accept the nomination were it offered. He hates everything!!

6 Likes

I also suspect the President would not withdraw support for Garland. If anything happens on that end, it’ll be Garland withdrawing his name after being tired of being toyed with or the Senate’s dam breaking, them having a vote on him, and rejecting him nonetheless.

14 Likes

Exactly what I said on another thread. It’s just not in this President’s DNA to use people as pawns in a political game. He’s simply too dignified and classy for that.

Republicans on the other hand…

15 Likes

This gives Republicans incentive to stonewall until the election. Heh heh heh…

2 Likes

Meh. It’s a long way off. Depends what happens between here and there, and what Hillary asks of him then.

And I cannot imagine a scenario where the President would withdraw his support from his nominee

Thank you! To assume that Prez Obama is using Garland strictly as a political pinata is just wrong.

Yes, I believe there were political considerations in his choice, but Garland, as a decent man and supremely-qualified candidate, has been in his top tier each time there was a SCOTUS opening.

Anyone who thinks that the Prez would dangle Garland out there as a GOTP punching bag for 8 months and then say … ā€œsorry, your political convenience is over … see yaā€, doesn’t understand that our president is a good and loyal man.

14 Likes

What does it say about this President that even his most ardent opponents assume that he is a class act and would not withdraw the Garland nomination. Mr. Obama is a man of his word, and everyone, even those who hate him, know it.

14 Likes

Well said. It took me about a gabillion more words to try to make the same point.

3 Likes

And those that hate him, hate him for it.

ā€œThere are two questions a man must ask himself: The first is ā€˜Where am I going?’ and the second is ā€˜Who will go with me?’ If you ever get these questions in the wrong order you are in trouble.ā€ –Sam Keen

14 Likes

He needs more imagination. lol

How about the Judge becomes ā€œillā€, or has a ā€œfamily emergencyā€.

1 Like

Garland seemed -way- too happy to be willing to withdraw his name for purely political reasons and I find it unlikely that President Obama chose him unaware of this.

5 Likes

Can’t wait for Trump to weigh in on Garland.

(With his brilliant insight and grasp of current affairs, he probably thinks Merrick’s the Elephant Man…)

5 Likes

Tighten 'em up, Obama…

Also too…translation: ā€œEat a fat hard one, Bernie.ā€

1 Like

Agreed. Yes, we like to focus on that aspect of it, but I tend to think he is first and foremost trying to do his fucking job and do it right.

7 Likes

He already has, in a fashion:

President Barack Obama plans to announce his Supreme Court nominee on Wednesday, but Donald Trump thinks the Senate shouldn’t give the pick a hearing.
ā€œI don’t think so, no I think they should do what they’re doing,ā€ the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination said on ā€œGood Morning Americaā€ Wednesday. ā€œI think they should wait until the next president and let the next president pick.ā€

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/trump-block-supreme-court-nominee-220852#ixzz43HVqLiWS

2 Likes

WHAt? PROgreSSIVEs don’t THINK He’s sufficiently doctrinaire BECAUSE wHY? HE DOEsN"T SUPPort Socialistic UTOPIARY? He Doesn’t EAT Aborted FETUSES? WHAT?

And this is exactly why I think Sen. Sanders was mistaken to say what he did. He’s trying to have his cake and eat it too:

I’m 100 percent prepared to support Judge Garland. I think he’s clearly very knowledgable and can serve ably on the Supreme Court, but between you and me, I think there are some more progressive judges out there,

If there’s some other judge that you’d like better, you’re not really 100% prepared to support his nomination, are you? And it introduces an unnecessary ā€œDemocratic candidate second guessing Democratic Presidentā€ narrative that just isn’t helpful when we should be presenting a unified front – President has constitutional authority to make pick, President made pick, we support President’s pick. Repeat, repeat, repeat.

Too bad: he’s way too conservative. We don’t need another Kennedy.

1 Like

WHO asked this question? This sounds like another one of those ā€˜We know WE’RE bad, but what about Obama???’ questions.

1 Like