Gosh, the sleazy Murdochs are dumber than I thought. They are not hiring the best help either. Why would you sign a contract containing a clause like that with a dirty serial sexual predator thug like O’Lielly?
O’Reilly was meeting with all those women to discuss the adoption of Russian babies.
.bad choice of words. sorry.
Free beer goggles were included with the payment.
So they anticipated sexual misconduct?
At Fox?! Nah…
Words escape me. What did O’Reilly have on old man Murdoch? Who in fuck is stupid enough to agree to such a clause?
so the income to debt ratio worked out to a 0 sum gain I suppose.
financial wizards at work. lol
I mean, who puts that in a contract? Obviously, only a company that is negotiating with a sexual predator. Oh, and this creep was willing to pay off his victims to keep them from taking him to court to the tune of 32 million dollars. So no worries. It’s all hush hush or he goes bye bye. How utterly damning that FOX wanted this pig bad enough to sign this thing.
I think the Sky News deal is dead. Why would any country want these spineless pigs anywhere near their media? Plus, FOX is Trump Pravda. Total poison.
Equine related Polaroids.
A huge LOL!! (also I need some eye and brain bleach, please)
O’Reilly simply had the same clause in his contract that Ailes did.
It is a “standard clause” in any MAN’s contract at FOX.
O’Lielly must have had an ol’ “pee tape” with Rupert as the receiver of said pee…
When I was a young boy of about 10 or 11 and my evil little cronies were starting to make dirty jokes and smirking about the breast-like protrusions on the bumpers of mid-fifties Cadillacs, I asked my mother what sex was.
After a pregnant pause, she said that: “Sex is something men do to women.” I now realize that her’s was a rather narrow viewpoint, but neverthess a very wise observation.
Thankfully Miss Kitty has never experienced such an epiphany.
Horseshit!
You mean ‘coitus’? An opposing view from one Maude Lebowski: “It’s a male myth about feminists that we hate sex. It can be a natural, zesty enterprise.” It’s all about consent, donchyaknow?
“O’Reilly’s contract with Fox News barred the network from firing O’Reilly over sexual harassment accusations unless the allegations were proven in court.”
So all Fox News has to do is see him convicted of harrassment or worse? That might be a two-edged sword.
So you can get rid of him, any time you don’t feel like getting him out of trouble.