This is a beautiful thingâŚ
Thank you, DonnieâŚ
[quote=âmaximus, post:2, topic:43740, full:trueâ]
This is a beautiful thingâŚ[/quote]
Ainât it though?
A shortfall of $10 million? Just how much are those dues?
Good GodâŚhow much ARE these âduesâ???
Many of the disgruntled conservatives believe the NRCC inherently favors more moderate candidates.
Teanderthals just donât get itâŚ
Wonder what a âgruntledâ TeaPub looks like.???
Please proceed, dimwits.
These âduesâ shortfalls happened before this election cycleâŚI believe my KY4th Caucus member and Cruz right arm was something like $700K behind before 2016.
Many of the disgruntled conservatives believe the NRCC inherently favors more moderate candidates.
What âmore moderate candidatesâ? Freedom teabaggers withholding dues money that could potentially go towards running more teabaggers in 2018?
I donât know, but I immediately got in my head the image of a bloody picture of a burning Saint in the hand of a man taking the oath of Omerta.
I got a different imageâŚ
These guys should wear purity rings and stay home.
Good governance requires listening to the other side of the aisle (Dems), but they canât even listen to their own party leaders!
My KY4th is such a big, lunking goof! Every photo of Ted Cruz during his Green Egg and Ham period showed this idiot close by, carrying Tedâs papers or lunch, and not serving the people of Kentuckyâs 4th Congressional District except to regularly email glossy updates of âissuesâ not in the news or of local concern.
Have they considering using a sit-in as a protest?
Fiscal responsibility, Freedom Caucus style. If we donât like a program we will stiff it. See Zika, Ebola, VA healthcare, IRS, etc.
Like any anarchist worthy of the title, Mulvaney has a âprincipled objectionâ to offering support to anybody, even an ostensible ally.
âI could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.â â P. G. Wodehouse
If the Freedom Caucus really wants to show their displeasure with the RNC and moderate candidates (aka RINOâs and Cuckservatives), then they should shut down the govât before the elections.
They could say that - like Judge Garlandâs Supreme Court nomination - the US government should be shut down until the American people can have a say in whoâs running the govât and deciding the budget.
(/ratfuck)
Iâd think they would like to take a more active approach. Something that resembles the storming of the Bastille, but not so Frenchy. Maybe replacing farm implements with their handy dandy 2nd Amendment implements. Oh and the little ladies wouldnât be left out they would be there, breasts fully covered, throwing tea bombs.