Hey, if the shoe fits. Personal integrity left SCROTUS with Bush v. Gore.
Bush did that to gain favor with right wing Republicans. The same Right wing Republicans who paid Bush back by voting for Buchanan in the 92 primaries and who either stayed home or voted for Perot in the 92 general election.
So he actually talks? I thought he just cashed a paycheck for doing the teabaggerâs bidding.
Roy Moore and any judges who follow his order should be fired and disbarred: immediately.
His words were a bunch of legalese:
âThis acquiescence may well be seen as a signal of the Courtâs intended resolution of that question,â Thomas wrote. âThis is not the proper way to discharge our Article III responsibilities. And, it is indecorous for this Court to pretend that it is.â
Here is the plain-English translation:
Even Antonin and I canât figure out any Constitutionally-supported justification for banning same-sex marriage, and Iâm pissed. Royally pissed.
Frick and Frack are at it again. They must be two of the most insecure heteros in the world. Donât blame your hate and self-loathing on God or Beyonce. As Pope Francis has said, echoing what Jesus said, âWho are we mere mortals to judge one another?â
In a republic, all citizens have the same rights or none of us do. Thomas doesnât want anyone to have any freedom and liberty because he doesnât trust himself when it comes to letting democracy decide. He has to leave it up to some Higher PowerâŚsuch as Scalia. Not my idea of a godly figure.
I believe heâs Scaliaâs man servant.
Poppy must have been indulging on the poppies?
It is incredulous that Thomas is feeling sorry for states who passed laws that discriminate against people, yet says nothing about the rights of people the states are discriminating against. Good thing he was not on the court when Loving v. Virginia was decided, let alone any other civil rights laws.
Oh yeah, Iâm sure they would have gotten around to it- someday: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/18/mississippi-13th-amendment_n_2712289.html
Has Thomas ever differed from Scalia on anything? He does just as Scalia tells him too.
Hell, stateâs rights would have prevented him from taking her to the movies or for a soda at Woolworthâs counter after. Interracial marriage wasnât even comprehensible.
Anything that pisses off Clarence Thomas, makes my day.
A former SCOTUS did âcorporations are peopleâ long before Bush v Gore.
Or Catholic agendas.
Long John speaks!!!
Maybe heâs sorry he was allowed to take her on that first date and just wants to protect others from making similar mistakes.
So, in your mind judicial philosophies overrule common sense and human decency?
ââŚTodayâs decision represents yet another example of this Courtâs increasingly cavalier attitude toward the StatesâŚâ
What he tipped his hand about is his belief, not in the States, but in the singular righteousness of the Feds.
The fact is States are finding what conservatives want to paper over, because conservatives want every state to ban it. Theyâd never in a million years tolerate even one.
Did the Supreme Court tip its hand? Duh, uh.
But the court really tipped its hand when it refused to overturn the 10th Circuitâs refusal to stay the decision overturning Utahâs ban on same-sex marriage.