Overheard in locker room:
âMan, that guy is hung like a yetiââŚ
Oh look, heâs a republican. What a shock. Really.
I was going to say - what about the schmuck state rep in Illinois who catfished men for online sex chats using sexy photos of his ex? But reading this (I missed the Daily Beast item) - about items found in his first book - that pretty much strip away any pretense of being academic-y - Iâd say you all called this one right!
My forehead hurts from so many face palms.
Completely OT, but former Danish Minister Manu Sareen is interviewed, while eating chiliesâŚ
(With subtitles)
Still not as bad as Jim Jordan.
We are being unfair here. Most Republicans engage in non-consensual BDSM (and take pictures and post them on the internet), using their ex-loversâ identity online to troll other men, and of course a variety of permutations of sex with adolescents and pre-adolescents. Heâs engaged in consensual kink with a mythical creature, and possibly setting up a side business in bigfoot erotica that would definitely have a following among his core supporters. I donât have a problem with that, and I think he should lose his election badly so he can have time to pursue this noble pursuit. I look forward to his postings to pornhub (but only when I really overdo the hallucinogens).
I canât believe Jason Spencer from Georgia didnât get the nod.
It says a lot that Nick Sauerâthe rep from Illinois is an also ran this week.
âbaby bigfeetâ not bigfoots. Yeah, I know, proper nouns, etc, but that really bothers me >.<. Not that Iâm into grammar/spelling porn or anything.
And this all illustrates perfectly why they had to start making this a weekly eventâŚ
Nah, I think they âareâ called Bigfoot in the plural as well. There was a crew from Animal Planet (and I GOT to say the episode of Finding Bigfoot was a laugh-riot around OUR house for DAYS. Hilarious.
Anyway, one crew guy my husband gave a ride back to their base when their drive broke down told HIM that they were looking for Bigfoot, their research was that there were LOTS of âBigfootâ in the area. So a âresearcherâ told us that Bigfoot is singular AND plural.
Of course that show is NUTS and there âisâ THAT.
What a riggledick.
Bigfoots is also correct, but the proper term is Sasquatch (thatâs a squatch).
Do not refer to them as Bigfeet unless you want to out yourself as a âferinerâ and risk ridicule.
I should also point out that photographs are, by tradition, of distant, out of focus blobs of fur. No actual, verifiable photos of Sasquatch male genitalia exist. There is no known data on the size of male reproductive parts. Any drawings are purely speculative and are, most probably, a reflection of the latent fantasies of those displaying said drawings.
The Patterson film appears to be of a femaleâŚ
Yah, but ya gotta ârun into a treeâ to make little sasquatches?? Whatâs up with that?
What disturbed me about the show âFinding Bigfootâ was essentially about setiously out of shape middle aged heavily armed idiots stumbling around in the hinterland⌠at night. Would it not be easier to see the dang critter in the daytime? And why the large caliber heavy armament? Stumbling around in the dark with guns is NOT a sane idea.
As long as everyone out there is a Republican, should we be complaining?
The folks who produce these paranormal search shows donât actually want to find anything. The money is in selling the promise of finding these âcryptozoidsâ (or ghosts or alien spacecraft). Once they get found (or debunked as nonsense), the showâs over. Searching at night makes for better theater and reduces the likelihood of a camera catching anything that might spoil the ârealityâ.
Isnât it about time to name the award âDick of the weekâ? Just sayin âŚ