Discussion: Dems To Grassley: 'Unprecedented Abuse Of Power' To Move Forward With Kavanaugh

Dems To Grassley: ‘Unprecedented Abuse Of Power’ To Move Forward With Kavanaugh"

Unprecedented? Eh, no.

Merrick Garland.

5 Likes

Unprecedented? Bullshit, its just another item on a very long list of Republicans abusing power. I wish Democrats would wake up to who they’re dealing with. By Any Means Necessary, that’s the Republican motto.

2 Likes

This will be categorically…ignored.

1 Like

Grassley: What’s the point of having power unless you can abuse it? We have worked damn hard to twist the Constitution to a point where we can enjoy our suzerainty…

4 Likes

Of course it’s not, but lets remember where the focus is right now.

1 Like

In eleven words, you’ve stated the entire Republican philosophy perfectly.

2 Likes

Sen. Grassley - the cost to go forward now, far outweighs the cost of canceling the hearings (all together). Take a hit in November (you are already set for a shellacking) due to an angry base, or take a hit for a generation of women of all ages - joined by many men. You didn’t individually choose the rape-y president who lies a lot, but now there is a choice about how to procede (and whether to rush forward) with a rape-y supreme court justice who lies a lot.

3 Likes

Oh, well, if it’s unprecedented, they totally won’t do it.

We’re safe, everyone! All that powder we’ve kept dry means that the GOTPers won’t possible do something UNPRECEDENTED.

Grassley to Dems: “Oh, go on! You’re too kind. Do you really think so?”

(“So they call me Concentration Camp Ehrhardt, eh?”)

2 Likes

Only the best words… And there is more to come at 5:00 PM EDT…

1 Like

If Flake moves to D stand and voters no can McConnel still bring to the full senate?

We need at least 2 GOP Senators to say no, and yet.there are some red state Dems who haven’t said how they will vote.
As long as the Turttle thinks he can win he will bring it to a vote

1 Like

All Flake has to do is abstain at the Committee level…

At least as far as my understanding goes…

Robert Bork lost in committee 9 - 5. and Thomas had a 7 - 7 vote. It apparently depends more on obstinacy and hubris than simple democracy.

2 Likes

Actually, they care less about losing the Senate than they do about installing a far right block on the SC. They won’t lose enough of the Senate to allow impeachment and dismissal (there will not be 67 Democrats in the Senate for a long time, if ever), so if Kavanaugh makes it he’s there for life. They are depending on that to block all of the things that a society moving towards more equality will do, so that their evangelical beliefs can be pushed on us instead. Turning the clock back to the 1950s, when white men ruled the nation and everyone else was powerless, is their goal, and the Senate is a small price to pay to achieve that, especially since they expect their SC judges to overturn any liberal ideals that they can, regardless of precedent.

That’s the game here, that’s why they keep pushing so hard to install Kavanaugh, and they are going to succeed at it regardless of what happens next. This act makes it more likely we’re looking at a major upset in our society soon, young people won’t stand for a SC that puts gays back in the closet or allows racism to thrive. It’s going to make the SC meaningless, as eventually a president and Congress will come along that ignores a law that gets overturned, and when that happens things will go off the rails pretty quickly.

3 Likes

A ‘vote to approve’ is not necessary to bring the nomination to the Senate floor for a vote by the entire body.

That’s what Bitch McConnell was threatening to do with his little tantrum the other day: he wants to dare any of his own senators to formally register a ‘NO’ vote on this nomination and, theoretically, jeopardize their future career in the party.

All that you say is spot-on.

You might, however, allow for the possibility that the D’s take the WH next time and ‘Uncle Clarence’ might have the decency to drop dead at that point, which would tip the balance back toward the center-left.

I expect Thomas to retire in 2019 to allow a younger racist, misogynist, evangelical, right wing nut job to take his seat.

1 Like

Solid thinking there.

All the more reason for all of US to help D’s re-take the senate in Nov.
(sorry 4 the delayed response)
:v: