Discussion for article #238844
Claireâs too fucking stupid to keep her mouth shut and let Donald continue his destruction of the GOP.
Goddamn I canât stand that idiotic woman.
I really donât think it will make Trump go away - and maybe he will think he is a real competitor.
Anyway, Ivana denied that she was raped in the âbadâ criminal way.
RightâŚwhat he meant to say was "You can rape anyone you want if youâre rich and powerful enough because youâll get away with itâŚitâs not really ârapeâ if youâre never convicted.â
SeriouslyâŚI had to laugh and facepalm at that too.
I donât like McCaskill but Iâd rather have a Dem in that seat. Also, if she can succeed at hanging Akin associations around Trumpâs neck, so much the better.
Could be though, a lot of white, male ,ultra conservatives will be all the more taken with the Donald as he is attacked by âestablishment elitesâ. As Krugman says in his blog this morning:
What Iâm wondering: How, exactly, does the Trump implosion everyone is predicting happen at this point? The punditocracy wrote him off over the McCain comments, and was totally wrong. If base voters havenât decided that heâs a buffoon yet, what new information will convince them?
Perhaps videos of him torturing Pocket Beagles might do it. Who knows?
Obviously, Trump DOES think a man can rape his wife⌠if heâs Mexican.
Sen. McCaskill scored a single with her anti-rape comment, but missed an easy grand slam by failing to critique Cohenâs obscene, chilling threat against the Daily Beast reporters 
What is also offensive to me is the stupidity of SarahGrosko 's tweet. How dare lawmakers know the law! Hrrrumph!
What a typically mindless millennial antiabortion Jesus freak.
So you would rather Akin had won?
Come on man, you are better than this.
The other GOP candidates must do something like Borowitz suggests:
In Bid to Take Attention from Trump, Other Fifteen Hopefuls Release Joint Sex Tape
âSure,â theyâll say, âheâs not criminologically correct like all those non-rapist candidates, but thatâs what I like about him! He doesnât let those Establishment lawmakers tell him what to do! Heâs refreshing!â I remember when Sarah P. was at her height, doing one astonishingly ridiculous thing after another, and her besotted admirers just drew her to their doughy bosoms all the more. At the time I figured she could come out on a stage, cook Trig and eat him, and theyâd excuse it in a moment.
You must be joking. Not calling it out would be âtoo fucking stupidâ. Donât worry, The Donald will not be denied in his scorched earth attempt to offend everybody who isnât in the 1% or old, white and angry.
Well, at least it would have been free-range Trig. 
Krugman ends the blog with this which is chilling though I did like the images
I donât know about other people, but I am starting to hedge my bets a bit. Maybe he really can get the nomination.
I would agree only in the sense that McCaskill weighing in as well as Wasserman Schultz is nothing but opportunistic cliche-ridden rhetoric as part of pitches for fundraising.
Because clearly, her Tweets will change everything!
My brother from STL has the misfortune to actually know Claire. Sheâs an asshole.
Still, he voted for her.
Iâm not saying that I donât want her in that senate seat. Iâm saying that even though I do want her in that seat, I canât stand her. Itâs strategic disliking.
