Teabaggers: rants up, old coots
Iâm sure the author(s) thought it was funny but in retrospect I hope they will have a change of heart. A person lost his life and to make light of it is in very poor taste.
What a racist POS, and the sign company will be racist, too, if it puts the sign up.
Now what do pants have to do with folks being pissed off if Officer Wison is exonerated? Someone please explain that one if possibleâŚ
Well you know, darrtown, the protesters are black.
So this means that (insert bullshit racist meme) is totally acceptable when referring to them.
Same as the âmake them bring work bootsâ zany zinger they tried to run with the other day when there were negotiations about the march going on.
Because you know, blacks. And work. Blacks? Work? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Or at least, thatâs how the racistsâ brains function â if you can call it that.
#RacistCOPDontSHOOT
The MSM would quickly label them as âthe REAL racists and race-baitersâ and go about supporting Darren Wilson like itâs done from the get-go.
Did I miss a trial?? No ones been tried in court yet, but plenty of media trials!!
Itâs an expression of white cultural rage at the style of black kids wearing their pants way too low and showing everyone their fucking undies all the time (i.e., âsaggingâ).
While I have to agree itâs a ridiculous, childish and stupid style, Iâm not exactly offended or enraged by it, but you know who is? Thatâs rightâŚI donât need to tell you whoâŚnor do I need to explain the cultural connections and origins of âsaggingâ for people to understand precisely why it enrages white conservative racists: black people do it and thatâs enough to set them off.
Gotta love how Timberlands became so popular haha
Right you are. Lamar (or CBS Outdoor, or Clear Channel) wouldnât touch this with a 10 foot pole, much less a 14 x 48 bulletin (thatâs an outdoor media joke!).
The only loophole I could see would be maybe some smaller board owned by a local media company, a 30-sheet or something. But that wouldnât have nearly the impact of a high-visibility bulletin. And it even stretches the imagination to think of a local company inviting controversy by permitting this artwork.
In short, I think this Tennessee guy is trolling big time, but apparently raising money doing it. In other words, fraud.
No Racist Dog Whistle going on here.
Nothing to see.
Move along.
⌠and outside agitating.
Not outdoor, but Iâve done enough media buying to know they wonât have a choice of âwhereâ.
And thatâs âifâ they find a local company either racist enough â or so needy for that $3000.
I donât see it happening.
This free exposure received online far outweighs that theyâd get on a billboard.
jw1
Lone_Apple, âthat billboardâ doesnât exist and probably never will. TPM has gone out of their way to create the impression that it does, however, or at least confuse the issue, with their âillustration.â
What could go wrong?
Good catch. It wouldnât hurt to include âArtistâs depictionâ in a byline credit.
Well, of course. Because stupid fashion choices are the equivalent of killing an unarmed teenaged boy.
Why didnât they just put up a billboard that said, âYeah, thatâs right. Weâre ignorant and proud of it!â
Didnât want to infringe on the climate deniersâ trademark.