When you’re explaining you’re losing.
Mr. Cramer, I sincerely hope we’ll soon remember your candidacy as “supposedly an attempt or something that never went anywhere.”
Well, clearly when Cramer is explaining he is losing.
The sexism and racism in the Republican rulers of the Federal Government isn’t even vestigial. It is core to their beliefs and inextricable from who they are.
These absurd allegations should be taken seriously. 
Dude. You might as well dress the federal government up as a witch and demand it be burned. You’re really kind of pushing there with the guilt by association.
“I never meant to call her a lying whore. I meant to call her an untruthful slut.”
I really don’t believe your “clarification” for one minute, Mr. Cramer. You and the GOP care as much about women as I care about whether Kanye West and Kim Kardashian are going to share the Nobel Prize for economics.
“At the time, there was a sense of legitimacy to what Anita Hill was saying,”
So to Cramer the therapist’s notes (or his/her testimony), Dr Ford’s friends who heard and know her story and a lie detector test and the fact she invites an FBI investigation while Kavanaugh does not… all of that pales to insignificance when compared to Kavanaugh’s say so.
Got it.
GOPers refuse to learn and demand to remain stupid is my take away
But then the asshole says, “the current allegations were even more absurd”, implying that Anita Hill’s accusations were absurd in the first place. Maybe Trump or someone else in the GOP should hold him down, cover his mouth to muffle his screams, and turn up the music so no one can hear any more of his idiocies. Since Republicans seem to think that young women enjoy that kind of treatment, then Mr. Cramer should be thrilled to be treated that way, too.
Thought he was going to go with the standard GOP walkback, “it’s just a joke”. Instead he settled for the old “the question I was answering” ploy. He should really hire a professional pr team. Maybe someone at CRC Public Relations could lend him a hand, or an anchor.
Burn 'em!!
But seriously now dressing Grassley and Hatch up as witches has a sort of poetic charm… considering they were around on the committee for the Anita Hill debacle. They wanna show the whipper snappers how it’s done anyway.
That’s what bothers me about this attempt to turn Professor Hill into a post modern Columbia. I barely remember everything from that time, but I do remember '90’s GOP senators applauding Thomas’s belief that Hill was a pawn in a supposed Democratic Party plan to lynch him.
I also believe that you cannot paint the entire federal government with the same brush as the Republican Party.
But as far as the GOP itself goes…well, since they wear black pointy hats, fly on broomsticks, and cackle in the moonlight, it might just be time to start gathering some dried twigs and branches and piling them up around the stakes.
I agree.
When you dress the GOP up as a witch and burn it, this is how you dress it:
And the hits just keep coming.
This is turning into a banner weekend for the GOP’s outreach to women.
They consort with The Enemy, they seek to destroy our way of life, they blaspheme our civil religion, their leader is literally soulless, I mean, it’s all there.
That would melt every mirror in my house and probably set it alight to burn to the ground.
Btw… how do i unsee that ?