Well, Kellyanne, it is easy–because there are similarities. (No, the two are not identical. The shooter in New Zealand believes his crazy ideas, while your boss only “believes” what he thinks will benefit him at the moment.) And it’s cheap for anyone with a computer, 'cause the Internet is still free.
So, there.
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck …
Perfectly normal just look at how many times Obama’s name appeared in a shooter’s manifesto…Oh it never did…
I thought ‘Cheap And Easy’ was Kellyanne’s nickname in high school.
“I think people look for the cheap and easy, especially if it fits their own ideology.” She called the comparison “predictable and outrageous.”
Well, she’s right. People do look for cheap and easy “explanations.” For example, her boss does it all the time – and if he’s not “predictable and outrageous,” then I don’'t know who is.
“Cheap and easy” is very easy, indeed, when the shooter himself names Dear Leader as his leader and the one for whom he’s taking his marching orders.
Those camps the Allies found in 1945…
They, too, came to some cheap and easy conclusions.
As in No Brainer?
Cheap and easy and true, Kelly.
Meanwhile, Tweedledee is doing this today:
and has a little line of ducklings swimming behind…
Cheap and easy? Yeah, it’s what’s called a no-brainer.
He could have been wearing a MAGA hat and Conway would have said the same thing–and added that he was probably a Democratic party deep state false flag plant.
Occam’s Razor can also apply.
Hey, Kellyanne, sounds like you couldn’t get your boss to denounce white supremacy. Or maybe you didn’t even try. I’m just wondering if you have ever thought about your own legacy?
There are too many facts which are all aligned – therefore the conclusion must be wrong!
I’ll give KAC due credit for degree of difficulty on this dive. She knew she had to nail it. She didn’t. 3.7 from the French judge, to go along with the painful * CRACK! * of the bellyflop.
Yep remember this??? No link to Trump here either…
If we didn’t already have a photo of the last panel, the image would be dismissed as over-the-top satire.