I was in the Green Room at CNN when KellyAnne honored me by letting me take this selfie with
her. Enjoy:
So are your boss’s linguistically incontinent freakouts about the impending collapse of the ACA marketplaces.
But, y’know, you just go ahead and do whatever, Kellyanne. I am actually commenting without bothering to read the article (sorry, Esme) because it really doesn’t matter whatever it is you said. The only people who care are the ones paid to write it down.
No, it is based on Trump’s past behavior.
It was a hypothetical that Hitler would invade Russia. And then he did.
[Conway] claimed proposals to shield Mueller from Trump’s influence are based on “hypotheticals.”
Preventive actions are generally based on hypotheticals and are intended to avoid a problem rather than being forced to react after the damage is done.
The entire Russia investigation is a hypothetical.
No, the investigation is a reality with the intended purpose of discovering whether a foreign government interfered in the election process. The investigation may lead not only to the prosecution of some people in the DT campaign and administration but also to the development of procedures to deter any future hypothetical interference.
DT should share his knowledge of all the best words with this spokeswoman.
The entire Russia investigation is a hypothetical.”
What?! Did she just say the Russia investigation is a hypothetical?
Those Grand Juries and their subpoenas damn sure won’t seem “hypothetical” to the recipients. When you’re willing to lie so easily and stupidity about this one thing, really brings everything she says into question.
Again, why is she disgracing the network Sunday programs today?? She’s literally told us she’s a liar.
I agree with Conway 100%. Trump won’t fire Mueller. He’ll fire Sessions and Rosenstein; the new AG will do the firing…
It’s called plausible deniability…
I think before we claim the GOP is out of ideas we should remember, if I remember correctly myself, that not that long ago we didn’t use the term “hypothetical” to dodge a certain class of questions. It’s a relatively new thing. Think of all the questions that involve if-then situations or other kinds of conditions, or simply imagine some situation in the future. It’s really an advance in the craft of question-dodging, and I think it deserves recognition.
I’d sue the doctor who did that sex change operation. The stitches are obviously coming undone. And the hormone treatment is failing to compensate for her hopeless macho NeoNazi tendencies. There will only be one Steve Bannon, Conway. Get thee to a nunnery.
I think I was enjoying the brief period where they weren’t putting KellyAnne on camera.
“The entire
RussiaWhitewater, Travelgate, Vince Foster, Cattle Futures, Private Server, Benghazee investigation is a hypothetical.”
Fixed.
OK I yield to no one in detesting Kelly Anne Conway as an amoral propagandist. But those two images are excellent examples of the difference you get between soft light and harsh light. To me the interesting point is whether in the second shot you have TV lighting techs desperately trying to warn America of the demon within by lighting her the way they did.
without a doubt kellyanne should fire her embalmer
…or hire a professional.
Thanks, @antisachetdethe, for cropping out the rest of the Glamor Shot labeled “before”.
Hypothetical. Uh Oh. Twelve letters, five syllables. That should baffle the base.
“Who took your glamshot, Kellyanne?”
“I use two photographers, Steven Marcato and Dorian Gray”