Discussion for article #228406
Many of the people who died ending slavery were draftees, not volunteers in that âvoluntaryâ effort.
Let me read between the lines. Donât âyou peopleâ have enough already???
Also, re: âvoluntaryâ Sure Iâll go along with that. And the civil âwarâ was just a very realistic re-enactment of what ending slavery MIGHT have looked like if not for the kind voluntary nature of the southern states. Also, the post civil war era civil rights abuses were just a further demonstration of what a non-voluntary racial integration MIGHT HAVE looked like.
This. Lady. Is. A. Moron.
Given the level of âintellectualâ thought this board member displays, Iâm going full-Godwin immediately:
Yes, we voluntarily ended slavery and the Nazis voluntarily closed the death camps once their supply lines were cut.
Then why did eleven states leave the nation (and start range wars in the new territories), and then fight a pointless and strategically hopeless war, to retain slavery, you fracking imbecile?
Did she say the north is âexceptional:â and the south is just âordinaryâ?
Yeah. Thatâs what weâre talking about, right there. Noble white southerners gave it up voluntarily despite all those troops the Yankees sent down to try to reimpose it at gunpoint.
If sheâs so concerned about the course, she should take it.
Is she really that dumb? I think I know the answer.
HmmmmmâŚseems to me that eleven slave states werenât too keen on âvolunteeringâ to end slavery. Seems they needed a bit of persuasion.
What a f*cking moron that woman is. The underlying gist of such a comment is: âWE freed THOSE PEOPLEâŚwhat more do THOSE PEOPLE want?â
And look at all the free, uninhabited land we gave to poor immigrants in Oklahoma. It was the nicest thing the US had ever done. It was so cool the Native Americans had left the area and moved on.
Furthermore, those noble southerners voluntarily gave up slavery âat great sacrificeâ of personal property!
âYes, we practiced slavery. But we also ended it voluntarily, at great sacrifice, while the practice continues in many countries still today!â
Wait, what?
-
In what sense was emancipation âvoluntaryâ? The slaveholding South seceded from the Union and started a war in order to NOT give up slavery. So, the slaveholders themselves didnât give it up âvoluntarily,â they had to be forced, more or less at gun point, to end the practice.
-
What would âinvoluntaryâ emancipation look like? I mean, technically, ALL of the nations in the Americas that practiced slavery (e.g. France, England, Spain, etc), all abolished the practice voluntarily (most before the US ended it). Would it be âinvoluntaryâ emancipation if another country invaded the US and forced the US to end slavery?
-
Legal slavery has been abolished in all countries (correct me if Iâm wrong). It may still be âpracticed,â but it has been made illegal everywhere, just like in the United States.
And the new AP guidelines have students examine exactly that âgreat sacrificeâ and the process of emancipation, so why does she think students wonât learn about that?
The description of âvoluntary, at great sacrificeâ is contradictory at best and a grotesque attempt to rewrite history. The loss of 600,000 lives is hardly âvoluntary.â
Today a bag of hammers read her Facebook posting, and itâs feeling pretty darn exceptional.
You mean voluntarily at the point of a gun donât you?
The bagger runs deep in this one.
If the killing of millions of people in a civil war is called voluntary then I give her credit for saying it. Yes, it took only a country divided against itself in a civil war to get people to voluntarily end slavery, and today nobody waves the confederate flag over state capitals.
In fact, thatâs exactly the kind of history people like her would prefer if they have their way.
How did we let these fucking morons into our schoolsâŚthe answer is simple, people who know better were too apathetic or consumed with their facebook walls to bother to run for the school board allowing train loads of nasty, stupid, bigoted turds to run and win the seats.