Hannity responded to the charge later on Friday, tweeting “Sorry, I wont subject my audience to conspiracy theory fake news.”
Sean Hannity has now resorted to humor??
Hannity responded to the charge later on Friday, tweeting “Sorry, I wont subject my audience to conspiracy theory fake news.”
Sean Hannity has now resorted to humor??
I don’t want to say it, but, okay, I will. Some smart people are saying, and I mean really smart people, that what goes on at Fox News is state propaganda. But it’s not me saying that.
“Other than my own conspiracy theory fake news, that is,” Hannity continued.
Hannity responded to the charge later on Friday, tweeting “Sorry, I wont subject my audience to conspiracy theory fake news.”
On Tuesday night, Fox News host Sean Hannity issued denunciations of the same forces he has assailed for months: the Clintons, the Deep State, the Democrats, Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, mainstream Republicans and, of course, the media. Those targets, though, would be familiar to even an occasional viewer of Hannity’s nightly program. More intriguing is a name that Hannity did not utter: Seth Rich.
He may as well (any may still) just ‘follow-up’ with calling it “fake news PeterStrock SteeleDossier GeorgeSoros Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi”.
Does the stuff coming of his mouth even count as ‘words’, imbued with any meaning, thought, or information, as opposed to ‘syllable sounds that provoke a fear reflex in a primed subject’?
It is too bad for Ingraham - she could be as much an evil supplicant as those other two put together, but Trump will never consider her for her attention grabbing headlines, because he will never think of her in terms of anything more than grabbing something else.
Chiselin’ Trump: “We never tell Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, or anyone elese at Fox News what to say.”
Reporter: “Well, if you don’t mind, I’d like to ask Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson, themselves, for confirmation.”
Chiselin’ Trump: “Don’t waste your time. We’ve already told them to deny it.”
I especially enjoyed when the meathead Hannity tried to refute that he is a scripted lapdog for Trump by using the Trump term “fake news.”
At the very least it is a symbiotic relationship. One cannot exist without the other.
That comment from Hannity actually made me laugh out loud.
Acosta has it backwards. Trump gets his scripts from Hannity and Carlson. We don’t have a state-run TV, we have a TV-run state.
Has Hannity ever gone one-on-one with anyone who’d disagree with him since the Hannity & Colmes days?
Just shows what wimps Hannity and Tucker are. Acosta and Cuomo could pistol-whip both of them in a debate, and they know it.
“None of us get a script from the government, none of us do that,” Hewitt said.
I’m about 200% confident I can find quotes from Hugh Hewitt in which he claims the “liberal media” gets its script from elected Democrats.
Uh oh…them is fighting words…stay tuned for The Unholy Three to mock and demean and denigrate Acosta on their shows tonight.
(cough cough Seth Rich cough cough)
But Hannity’s the one who gets the pillow talk.
It took a lot of courage for Sean Hannity to take on Sean Hannity.
Purely unintentional.
We all know conservatives can’t do humor.
Yes, that describes it well. It’s become a fully closed feedback loop, where job applicants and various suckups go on Fox to speak directly to trump, the fake “news” readers report on what trump said, which is what he just heard on Fox, and the chyrons turn into his executive time tweets.
So absolutely bizarre.