Discussion for article #235233
Theyâre just trying to make him get angry again.
HEY RAND! Can you reconcile devotion to Ayn Rand with being a hyperchristian?
Rand Paul⌠situational opportunist âlibertarianâ
Or, why did he sign Tom Cottonâs Iran letter in March after saying he wanted to let negotiations work in January?
Libertarians, like the Lord, work in mysterious ways.
Itâs OK as a contract? Isnât that what marriage is, a contract between two parties? And why are married people given benefits/breaks that unmarried people do not get? Stop the Bull and finally make it ⌠âEquality for allâ.
Rand is a hypocrite, trying to have it both ways on every issue. Then when asked about by a female reporter he attacks and tries to belittles the reporter, and never answers the question.
Rand isnât a libertarian. Heâs a right wing Bircher who likes to get high.
Rand Paul, ladies and gentlemen! â Which side of his mouth will he be speaking from today?
Maybe we should just call him âPander Rand.â
Heâs just a typical libertarian: he wants to be free to make as much money as possible without being taxed. Everything else is fair game for regulation.
Thereâs a difference?
Or as Mitt Romney put it, Iâm running for office, for Peteâs sake!
When he lived here in Bowling Green, he absolutely believed that gay people ought to be able to marry. One more than one occasion he has said that it was no business of the state or the Fed to tell people who could and could not get married. Then he also said âWhen I start running for Senate, I wonât be able to say those things any more, otherwise I wonât get elected.â
Rand claims to support a âcivil contractâ for gays. Wonder how Rand will explain why the anti marriage equality laws included language outlawing civil unions.
Yes, according to Randâs traditional religious version of marriage it is a contract between 2 people: The father of the bride, and the father of the groom.
Dana Bash just got herself, and most likely all of CNN, on Rand Paulâs enemies list.
I doubt Rand Paul, serial plagiarist, flip flopper, and liar, and son of same, if not worse, will do anything but run like Hell when confronted by any representative off CNN henceforth.
Theyâve now classed themselves with Mother Jones. To the Teapot mind, MoJo was responsible for the demise of Mitt Romneyâs campaign. Thru the sleuthing, if you can call it that, of David Korn. That made it the enemy. And we all know how powerful men, elected at the behest of a minority, the Teapots, plan to govern, when they get their mitts on the levers of power, particularly toward anyone who asks questions, gets in the way, or exposes any unflattering truths.
Theyâll make Nixon, Halleman, and Erlichman and the enemies list look mild
Better study up on how to encrypt all communications.
Gay marriage offends him? Letâs hope that someone asks him why. Is his life consumed with imagining how gay people have sex? And if so, just what about that does he find offensive?
People (gay, straight, whatever) have sex in all sorts of ways that this self-certified libertarian ophthalmologist evidently doesnât grasp. Or perhaps itâs not offensive when heterosexual couples do it, because: bigotry.
A âConvenient Libertarianâ who doesnât believe in the separation of church and state.
Real definition of âLibertarianâ is Look out for #1 and F%$k everyone else!
RE: âI think that thereâs a religious connotation to marriage. I believe in the traditional religious connotation to this.â -Rand Paul
âTo rest oneâs case on faith means to concede thatâŚone has no rational arguments to offer.â - Ayn Rand