Discussion: CNN: DOJ Denies Senate Request To Sit Down With FBI Officials, Citing Mueller

1 Like

:relieved: Get out of the way! and let ā€˜Mueller Timeā€™ do his thing.

5 Likes

Iā€™m very leery of Feinsteinā€™s behavior with respect to all of this. Maybe Iā€™m wrong, but I feel like sheā€™s more concerned with inflating her importance through congressional interference in the investigations than she is in protecting the integrity of what Mueller is doing. Itā€™s making her all too willing to entertain Grassleyā€™s abject nonsense. She should be telling him to go fuck himself and telling the MSM that heā€™s full of shit when it comes to whatever his latest attempt to taint everything is. The mantra should be ā€œlet Mueller do his job and the investigation run its course and stop trying to play apart in it.ā€

4 Likes

Apparently, the FBI is not responsible to the American people. Good to know. Under Sessionsā€™ watch, they all now work for T rump and Russia. Iā€™ll remember this when Mueller nails Jefferey Beauregard Sessions IIIā€™s ass to the bench with felony obstruction of justice charges.

1 Like

Actually, this is a good thing. No legitimacy should be lent to Grassleyā€™s attempts to inject himself into the mix. He wants to interview these people in an attempt to prove that Comey wrote the exoneration of Clinton before the investigation was over as part of his ongoing efforts to kill Comeyā€™s credibility and help Faux News generate conspiracy nonsense about Comey, the Clinton investigation and, by extension, Muellerā€™s investigation. Feinstein will tell you sheā€™s going along with Grassley to keep the peace and will act as a check on his nonsense, but she wonā€™tā€¦her going along with him at all just helps him. There is zero immediate need for them to ask their questions now other than Grassleyā€™s ā€œneedā€ to try to undermine Mueller and Feinsteinā€™s ā€œneedā€ to be in the limelight.

19 Likes

Donā€™t they have anything better to do right now? How about looking into the cretinous Trump nominees more closely? Also, itā€™s time for DiFi to retire. Needless to say, Grassley too but too much to wish for. By all means, more 80-year Senators.

4 Likes

I will assume a different motive on Feinsteinā€™s part: if a bipartisan request is denied (as she probably knew it would be) that is definitively the end of the line.

But retire? That would make Grassley the oldest Senator. Grassley should retire. There are some retiring Congressmen and Senators who are nearly as old as Grassley was when he was elected to his first term as senator in 1982.

3 Likes

Au contrere mon frere - this is a good thing, see sniffitā€™s excellent post below.

1 Like

Grassley is not an honest broker - any D efforts to provide him with bipartisan cover should be viewed with extreme skepticism.

2 Likes

Ahhhhhhhhhhhā€¦yes, by all means, do not let Mueller do his job.

1 Like

The desire to be bipartisan, while worthwhile, should not be the be-all, end-all - particularly if the counter party may not have clean hands.

1 Like

Well, of course, Grassley should retire as well. I say anyone over 70 should retire (and Iā€™m not young). This is like tenure at a university, where all of the professors in a department are over 70 and donā€™t retire. The world needs young blood to survive and grow.

1 Like

Yeah, Iā€™m going to go with this being a good thing. The Congress is not primarily an investigative body, they should be writing laws. Director Mueller and his staff will do just fine, and they donā€™t go on TV to make themselves look good. There is far too much preening for the cameras and kabuki on C-SPAN in my opinion. As others have pointed out, Grassley is hardly an impartial observer. Let the Special Counsel do his job, then work on legislation, or dare I say it, impeachment.

2 Likes

I think we would all hate what the Senate intelligence committee would look like if Dianne retired. Be careful what you wish for.

Iā€™d be fine with it.