Yes it was said precisely, but it’s still a fiction.
babyjocko. LOLOLOLOL
It’s EASY to “lose money” on a casino when 50% of your earnings (or higher) go to pay your mob connections.
ALL of Trump’s “Bankruptcies” were really just “Financial Engineering” of the company to;
A) Remove Trump from any management responsibility at the demand of the Banks.
B) Cover Trumps ass financially so he would not lose money on the deal.
Trump is a terrible manager and fucks up everything he touches.
Classic Trump quote from a 1990’s bankruptcy: A reporter asked Trump why he was “Still living the high-life when his casino was in bankruptcy”. He answered: “When you owe the bank $50 that is your problem. When you owe the bank $50 Million that is the banks problem.”
That is how he intends to run the country, just like one of his casino’s, mob-graft and all.
Thank you for your truly peculiar perspective.
Your first sentence is a lie, based on the insipid drivel in your comment profile.
Why you choose to quarrel with CNN’s exit polling is a mystery—unless you just don’t have the intellectual wherewithall to grasp the basic facts presented.
Now either start posting on topic or get flagged.
No, it is not a fiction.
CNN has the data on what people said in the exit polling, which is why CNN reported this publicly.
Don’t count on it. The Dems have not learned the lesson of 2000 where liberals were left to vote for Nader. Instead of blaming Gore’s loss on Nader, they should have welcomed the liberal base instead of alienating them for the previous eight years as Clinton did.
The Dems continue to take votes for granted. They have always done so with African-Americans and they continue to do so with liberals. Until they reconnect with liberals, they will never win a national election again. Obama was an anomaly because he tricked liberals into Hope and Change. HRC can do no such thing. In fact, HRC would have been better off running as a moderate Republican. A centrist Democrat cannot win a national election.
The amount of overt stupidity, deliberate lies, and general assholery in your comment beggars description.
Well you certainly started out poorly on that front.
Well you could say El Duderino if you aren’t into the whole brevity thing.
Well it isn’t “nonsense” but factually accurate exit poling data.
But your flipping out must be FOR SOME REASON
123,865 to be precise.
Yep. Given it was an open primary, the GOP race had already been decided, and West Virginia is a blood red state and Clinton taking on coal (while Sanders went radio silent on the issue in that state) yet the emo-left still screams she is in the pocket of fossil fuels. Too funny.
You mean like, are you now or have you ever given a paid speech?
Which part is a fiction: that as many as 40% of Sanders’ primary voters in West Virginia (emphasis mine) did not intend to vote for Sanders in general? This is a factual result of exit polls and while polls could be wrong, I did not see any respected political observer questioning this number. You, on the other hand, gave no reason why this number should be treated as fiction.
And your data and evidence that the polling data by CNN and widely reported at the time is “fiction” why and how precisely?
So with that knowledge in the public domain, what are “liberals” excuse for not repeating that same mistake and instead voting for the Democratic nominee, who has the same liberal rating as Elizabeth Warren?
There, there. It must feel much better to get all that out. Always remember that I’m here to listen.
Are you saying HRC is as liberal as Elizabeth Warren? If so, you just embarrassed yourself. You have no clue what you are talking about.
CNN is credible? Sure thing, Sherlock; now will you go away?
Clinton also has a history of very liberal public statements. Clinton rates as a “hard core liberal” per the OnTheIssues.org scale. She is as liberal as Elizabeth Warren and barely more moderate than Bernie Sanders. And while Obama is also a “hard core liberal,” Clinton again was rated as more liberal than Obama.
That’s what the data says.
So you have nothing.
Got it.
OMG! So, if it takes something you’ve read from the Internet to convince you that HRC is liberal, then you have proven to have no brain. You are just an automaton.
Anyone with half a brain and has a clue about HRC knows where resides within the socio-political spectrum, and it is nowhere near liberal. She, herself proclaims to be a ‘centrist’, which in today’s America is what the GOP was as late as the Reagan Administration.
I hate to interrupt with something about the article, but I just want to say oh, man, it’s on. She’s been whacking him with a table leg since MTP yesterday. Never mind the vulgar, never mind racist. He doesn’t care about that. But she’s calling him a loser and a fake. That, he cares about bigly. He’s going from preschool dodgeball to an old-school bare knuckles prize fight.