Discussion: Clinton Slams 'Shameful,' 'Offensive' And 'Dangerous' GOP Anti-Muslim Rhetoric

Discussion for article #245077

She was really great on this question and issue.

13 Likes

I donā€™t have cableā€“and, therefore, canā€™t see thisā€“but it sounds like she really did connect and gave a great response.

3 Likes

Great answer, and great passion. Nice job on this one Hillary.

Bernieā€™s been slamming Trump along similar lines about every chance he gets. Perhaps Hillary has been too, and this is just the first time itā€™s been reported, or at least the first time Iā€™ve noticed.

Either way, she knocked it out of the park.

3 Likes

She didā€¦she was pretty high energy all around tonight.

Personally, I think Oā€™Malley did the best job in this sort of format. I think the makes a lot of sense and he does have one hell of a proven track record of getting things doneā€¦ahead of the curve.

But the analogy I have for him in this race, is its sort of like being an ā€œAā€ studentā€¦in a class that includes Einstein. He is just outclassed by Hillary on nearly every issueā€¦except the environment. And on that issue, I think he blows both Hillary and Sanders away. Sadly, that issue isnā€™t touching many hot buttons with Democrats this primary.

8 Likes

Thatā€™s why I think heā€™d be a great choice for Veep. Groom him to be Hillaryā€™s or Bernieā€™s successor in 2024.

2 Likes

Oā€™Malley was very impressive. He and Hillary both did a great job on a wide range of issues. Bernie was good but not in their league. I really appreciated what Oā€™Malley had to say on the climate change question.

6 Likes

Pandering to the many ignorant haters is easy non leadership. Calling them out is courageous. The questioner was more American than most by fighting for the country in which so many despise her for her religion. By her answer, Hillary showed the kind of leadership that decent Americans seek in a president.

8 Likes

Okay, so I just watched the replay of the town hall. I will say this, with the utmost confidenceā€“we, as liberals, have three competent, able, smart, knowledgeable candidates to choose from. It is infinitely a better choice than anything on the other side with that group of hateful assholes. I am not a fan of Hillary, but there is no denying that woman knows her shit. Sanders and Oā€™Malley have firm grasps on all the issues on the liberal checklists, as well. And, while Iā€™m not enamored with any of the three, canā€™t put my finger on why, but Iā€™m just not, we do have three, although boring, very qualified candidates to choose from.

So, my two centsā€“(strictly for observational and conversational purposes)

I have the most skepticism about Hillary because of her chummy relationship with Wall Street and how she, so effortlessly, goes negative and resorts to cheap shots when pressed. I still canā€™t get the ā€œpeople will vote for Obama out of white guilt.ā€ comment out of my head, as well. So, thereā€™s that.

However, I, also, am skeptical about Bernieā€™s overall elect-ability. And, as much as I love the sound of some of the things heā€™s proposing (free tuition, single payer), I question their practicality, and doubt they have any prayer to get by a hostile GOP House.

I suppose, gun to my head, I would support Oā€™Malley if the NJ primary, in June, was going to matter. But, it will, most likely, be a done deal by then assuming the super-delegates go the way of Clinton like they are projected to, by the ā€œexpertsā€. But, itā€™s not for any other reason than heā€™s just closer to my generation than the other two (Iā€™m 41, heā€™s 53), which isnā€™t a very good reason.

But, they all cover most all the liberal issues that matter. I like that Oā€™Malley seems to prioritize climate change as his number one priority. So, I guess that gives him the nod.

But, as anyone who reads what I write consistently knows, Iā€™m going to the polls to continue Obamaā€™s policies, and for re-seating SCOTUS purposes. I am voting for Obama in Novemberā€¦again. It will just have Hillary Clintonā€™s or Bernie Sandersā€™s name by the lever/button. So, this is all moot.

Letā€™s see if we can discuss without it devolving into a ā€œI hate Hillary/Bernieā€ mud slinging event. I would love to know all your respective thoughts.

10 Likes

ā€œWhen the know-nothings get control, [the Declaration of Independence] will read: ā€˜All men are created equal except negroes, foreigners and Catholics.ā€™ When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty ā€“ to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.ā€ ā€“ Abraham Lincoln

1 Like

Good job by Chris Cuomo shilling for the Clinton side. Letā€™s see, demanding Yes or No answers to from Sanders to right wing talking points (ā€œBig Governmentā€, ā€œSocialistā€) and fawning all over Clinton like a fanboy.

I have some questions for Cuomo. Have you had even smalltalk with the Clinton side (including supporters) about your brother being part of a Clinton ticket or administration? Have you had even smalltalk about joining a Clinton administration yourself as, for example, Press Secretary? Yes or No.

feelthebutthurt

2 Likes

LONG OVERDUE!

Iā€™ve been noticing this for years. The Reich-wing constantly goes after ā€œthemā€, or ā€œthose peopleā€ who are not like ā€œusā€; the "Real Americansā„¢ā€.

I can only assume you are getting the same Reich-wing emails I do, loaded with references to ā€œthose peopleā€ who live in Ferguson, Baltimore, and the ever-popular, ā€œDetroitā€. Itā€™s ā€œthose peopleā€ who donā€™t pay taxes, who donā€™t work, who are lazy, and not like ā€œusā€. Itā€™s that damn ā€œ47%!ā€

ā€œ(Those Americans) who are dependent upon government, who believe they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to take care of them, who believe they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you name it.ā€ - Romney with his 47% dog-whistle.

Yes. Itā€™s ā€œthemā€, those stupid lazy fuckers who, if theyā€™d just get a job and stop lighting shit on fire and just take some fuckinā€™ pride in themselves!

Repukes blame the poor, not private sector loans, for the bank crisis in 2008 and 2009. ā€œTheyā€ triggered that crisis. ā€œThose people.ā€ ā€œTheyā€ didnā€™t have to take jobs that put them at risk, they shouldā€™ve gotten ā€œbetterā€ efffing jobs!!

ā€œIt is profoundly antisocial and un-American to empower the nonproductive segments of the population to destroy the country - which is precisely why Barack Obama zealously supports registering welfare recipients to voteā€¦ Encouraging those who burden society to participate in elections isnā€™t about helping the poor. Itā€™s about helping the poor to help themselves to othersā€™ money. Itā€™s about raw so-called social justice. Itā€™s about moving America ever farther away from the small-government ideals of the Founding Fathers.ā€ - Ambulatory bag of rank resentment, Matthew Vadum.

Eff these guys!

1 Like

If she becomes the Democratic nominee, she will pick Julian Castro as her running mate.

1 Like

Nothing to add from here. You make good points. We have three good candidates for prez. One of them will face the Republican. Hopefully by then we will be united.

1 Like

Unlikely. Itā€™s pretty well known that they despise each other.

2 Likes

Wouldnā€™t surprise me.

Iā€™m calling it like I see it. End of discussion.