Discussion: Clinton: 'I'm Confident' There Will Be Another Debate With Sanders

TPM Article Topics
1
Clinton: 'I'm Confident' There Will Be Another Debate With Sanders Clinton: 'I'm Confident' There Will Be Another Debate With Sanders Back to article
2

So.
What will today’s 300 comment TPM sh^tstorm look like?
How does this statement of confidence allude that HRC is even more dishonest and untrustworthy?
Than even yesterday?
FossilfuelfossilfuelfossilfuelGreengreengreengreenpeacepeacepeace!!!11!!
How many repetitive comments about the AUMF vote?
Or stupifyingly redundant Goldman Sachs tidbits of innuendo?
Or Steinem anyone?

Answers to these questions and more-- to come!
I’m certain of it.

jw1

25 Likes
3

Well, good. I´ll watch.

5 Likes
4

I will watch, too. Like a good citizen.

5 Likes
5

Good. She will get to ask him about posting his full tax records, and she will also be able to refute the fossil fuel lies. I hope she will have a good answer to his constant insinuations about Wall Street with some objective facts about her voting record.

She will have an opportunity to talk about downstream Democrat support (which he declines to do), especially if he whines about the DNC. She will have the opportunity to ask what measures he can use to get the issues he is running on, through Congress, since they are not accomplished anywhere else.

15 Likes
6

if Hillary can get a debate date with Mr “my way or the highway”, she can add that to her long resume of accomplishments and he gets another chance to talk over her with finger flying and yell “wall street”, “wall street”, “wall street”.

11 Likes
7

Chuck Chuck Todd Todd Chuck Chuck Todd Todd Chucky Chuck Todd Todd Chucky Chuck Todd Todd Chunky Chuck Toddler Todd Chunky Chuck Toddler Todd Clunky Chunky Chucky Tonka Toddler Todd Clunky Chunky Chucky Tonka Toddler Todd Clunky Spunky Chunky Chucky Tonka Fodder Toddler Todd Clunky Spunky Chunky Chucky Tonka Fodder Toddler Todd Clunky Spunky Chunky Lucky Chucky Tonka Fodder Toddler Potter Todd Clunky Spunky Chunky Lucky Chucky Tonka Fodder Toddler Potter Todd Clunky Spunky Chunky Lucky Charming Chucky Tonka Fodder Toddler Potter Farming Todd Clunky Spunky Chunky Lucky Charming Chucky Tonka Fodder Toddler Potter Farming Todd Clunky Spunky Chunks Alarming Lucky Charming Chucks Tonka Fodder Toddler Forming Potter Swarming Farming Todd Clunky Spunky Chunks Alarming Lucky Charming Chucks Tonka Fodder Toddler Forming Potter Swarming Farming Todd

Clunky Spunky Hunky Chunks
Alarming Monkey Lucky Charming
Chuck
Tonka Fodder Funky Toddler Formations (from now on, please)
Potter Swarming Powder Dunking, Bunking with Farmer
Todd

I hope I’ve made myself clear.

12 Likes
8

Bravo! It would take years´ worth of David Brooks columns to say as much :wink:

4 Likes
10

And yet even after this 10,000th debate, I don’t know if I’ll be sure which candidate I want to support…

3 Likes
11

@daveyjones64 linked to a Larry Sabato article on a different thread this morning–
(while inferring that he finds that Sabato tends to lean rightward)
http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/

I found these two aspects of Sabato’s ‘Crystal Ball-themed’ article interesting.
This comment:

We’re now at the point in the nominating process where it is, er, crystal clear that Hillary Clinton will end up being the Democratic candidate, and Donald Trump, while not at all the certain winner, is the leading candidate to become the Republican nominee.

And Sabato’s revised EV Map (where last May it looked like a conventional pre-GE prognostication):

Pasted image600×428 204 KB

Reminding that only 270 EVs are required to win the presidency.

I’m liking what this portends.
Let’s make it a reality (D)s.

jw1

9 Likes
12

I know, right? Vetting candidates is boring!

1 Like
13

I’ve learned to never print the T-shirts before you actually win, but this stuff is pretty hard to resist.

3 Likes
14

I agree (with edits).

jw1

2 Likes
15

Vetting? That’s what we’re calling that…thing…that happened?

3 Likes
16

Damn y’all are good this morning. Funny comments. hahahahahaha

1 Like
17

I see that you´ve evolved from straw man arguments to literally changing people´s posts. You´ve come a long way.

4 Likes
18

Though as a marketer? You simply print winning t-shirts for both sides–
sell the winning ones for way over markup to winners who generally pay the price–
and donate the losing tshirts for a mission to a country in need of tshirts.

Saw pictures from Somalia, Chad, Sudan of-- NY Knicks 1994 NBA Champions– for years!

jw1

4 Likes
19

So you snarking me is haha-funny.
Me snarking you is somehow lacking integrity.

The whining does has become you Carlos.
The new normal.

jw1

5 Likes
20

Yea i know they do that, but as a participant - you really gotta stay clear of Karmic mistakes - they can bite the “sure” winner. Of course being a beneficiary of said mistake is pretty cool.

1 Like
21

“So you snarking me is haha-funny.”
“Me snarking you is somehow lacking integrity.”

Ah … yeah.

6 Likes