Discussion for article #224389
“It’s not clear exactly where McDaniel got the 35,000 figure.”
Let me help you out. It was his butt.
Does his new legal theory involve the nee-grows?
What about Benghazi?
So it’s only illegal to vote in the GOP runoff if you eventually vote Dem in the general. So McDaniel really can’t complain until November. That should work out just great for him.
Hey Klanner, your 15 minutes are up!
“Please proceed.”
“It’s not clear exactly where McDaniel got the 35,000 figure.”
From the Teabaggers who broke into the Courthouse.
No?
Okay, what about the Space Aliens? What were THEY doing Wednesday night?
Competence as a professional politician includes the ability to be defeated, re-group, and come back. This is where Cochran succeeded. It is the same place McDaniel is flaming out–he reveals his incompetence (and hence, the impossibility that any of these imaginary “challenges” will ever succeed) every time he opens his whiny yap.
It’s not clear exactly where McDaniel got the 35,000 figure.
I believe it was a bit south of his mason-dixon line.
McDaniel looks to gain the support of the crybaby demographic.
So what McDaniel is saying is that he voted or planned to vote for the Democrat in the 2003 Mississippi gubernatorial general election? Either that or he himself broke the law. It has to be one of the two.
So now McDaniel claims he can read minds
There is only one aspect of this election in which Chrissie McDaniel is finding success: he is turning his name into a synonym for whiny loser.
Candidate X: “I’m gonna request a recount.”
X’s campaign manager: “You lost the election, X. Face it. Don’t go all McDaniel on me.”
Nobody likes a sore loser.
For the first time—and probalby the last—I agree with MorningSchmoe.
McDaniel is too stupid to figure out how to win, so he whines instead.
Well, nobody that is sane.
this from a man who not only hired a blogger to sneak into mts Cochran’s nursing home and photograph her without permission, but had staffers who broke into the courthose room where uncounted ballots were located!.
TPM: Mississippi state Sen. Chris McDaniel ® … claimed that it is illegal for voters to back one candidate in the primary but another in the general.
Is this in fact accurate, TPM? It’s my understanding that the law was tossed by a federal court on the grounds that it was unenforceable.
Edited to Add: Never mind. TPM covered it later in the story. My bad for commenting before reading the story through.
As we use to say on the play ground: whiny crybaby tittle tat!
Chris McDaniel: “And we know many of those Democrats did vote in the Democratic primary just three weeks ago which makes it illegal.”
I doubt anyone voted in both the GOP runoff and the Democratic primary. It’s such an easy thing to check for at the polling station.
Even if it wasn’t checked then, it shouldn’t be that difficult to check now.
So, if no Democrat voted in both primaries, is it possible for Democrats who voted in the GOP primary to take McDaniel to court for slander as a class action suit?
I know it won’t happen - but just the idea of making McDaniel pay $100 or so to every Democrat who voted against him in the runoff fills my heart with glee.