Good to see the AP is still flogging their flawed and biased “analysis” of the Clinton Foundation. After all the discussion on that story, sort of says all you need to know about their priorities (truth vs. attack Clinton).
The rating itself is a fixed algorithm, described in detail on the watchdog’s website.
Good job, burying this after a couple of paragraphs pointing out the relationship between CN and CF and pointing out how CN says that relationship didn’t influence the rating. It’s a fixed fucking algorithm; there is no way for any relationship to change the result. So if you said that at first, you could have just added, “so there is no way for any current or prior relationship between the two charities to influence the rating” as, you know, a point of factual reporting.