Discussion for article #225148
The State really should not execute its citizens.
Tell that to the victims 6 ft. underground. And theseâs criminals are sitting in jail still alive and breathing.
One killing isnât right, so therefore two are?
The Bible reads âThou Shall Not Killâ. I donât see any ambiguity there.
Of course if you donât believe in and support the words in the Bible, you should be stoned to death.
A eye for eye.
If we lived in a perfect world, then justice would be perfect; but itâs not.
The National Academy of Sciences says that:
- 138 death row inmates were exonerated between 1973 and 2004
- 200 more are innocent
- 2,675 more were taken off death row after doubts about their convictions were raised
â[T]he law holds it better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent party suffer.â â William Blackstone
âIt is more important that innocence should be protected, than it is that guilt be punished.â â John Adams
âIt is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer.â â Benjamin Franklin
Wearing mixed fabrics? Eaten pork? Done any coveting?
I saw Laura Schlesinger on TV once and she said the âThou shall not killâ was meant as âDonât kill other Jewsâ, leaving everyone else as fair game.
Yeah, good 'ol hater and GOPer Dr. Laura.
Yeah, itâs right there in Matthew: âYou have heard that it was said, âAN EYE FOR AN EYE, AND A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH.â 39"But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.â
Whoops, the new kid shows up the bearded sky man by updating psychology from the desert nomads to the settled society. Why donât you come along?
And thatâs Hammurabi anyway. Some of us were paying attention in school.
it means what it means in those cases. Please donât twist and turn it to mean something different.
Uh, just to be clear, Iâm telling you âan eye for an eyeââlex talionis, to get all Latiny wit itâlong predates the Bible and comes from a different tradition. What youâre trying to say I have no idea.
Iâm against the death penalty, but this ruling just does not make sense to me. Basically, the judge is saying it is not cruel and unusual to kill people, but it is cruel and unusual to let people live too long before you kill them. He is basically saying that it is cruel and unusual to let those sentenced to death have as many opportunities to overturn the sentence as they currently have, and it would be more humane, I guess, if we gave defendants fewer appellate rights and just killed them sooner. This may survive the Ninth Circuit, but it will never survive SCOTUS. And, remember, Iâm against the death penalty.
It may be simple-minded but Iâve always thought the idea that some crimes are so heinous they cry out for the death penalty wasnât sound, because essentially it says itâs OK to kill people if youâre very, very mad at them. The problem is thatâs very often the murdererâs argument. That, and the horror we ought to feel at the possibility of executing an innocent person, makes opposing the death penalty an easy choice for me.
You unfortunately assume that people who are opposed to the barbarism known as capital punishment are at the same time condoning the criminalâs crime. Not so. The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution bans âcruel and unusual punishmentâ, and to inject someone with some mashup drug not guaranteed to quickly and humanely kill the prisoner fits that description. There is also the matter of innocent people acquitted through DNA research after being executed, and the zealousness of prosecutors eager to put another âkillâ notch on their belts.
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
Mahatma Gandhi.
. . . makes the whole world blind.
Last I checked the bible is not the law of the land.
Indeed, I donât give a ratâs tutu what the bible says or doesnât say and Iâm against the death penalty.
The prison system should be for protecting society from criminals, not for punishment.
While i did not want to come to this but here i go. You talk about this and you talk about that, but what it come down to if it happen to one of your family members i can bet a yrs. pay check you would think different. And that is a fact, jack.