Bundy: Feds Have No Jurisdiction Over Federal Lands!
Scalia: He has got a valid and legal point there.
Clarence Thomas: I concur, the land belongs to the people.
NRA: If you have guns, you can take over anything you want.
Duh-Nyed!
Call your first witness.
I hope Bundyâs attorneys are getting their fees up front.
On a more serious note, what the hell else are they going to claim? Itâs not like they can say the feds got the wrong guy, or itâs just a big misunderstanding.
They want to get their âsupportersâ riled up. This is going nowhere. Bundy and his grumpy band of malcontents should decorate their cells, it is going to be home for a very long time.
Orly Taitz on line 5.
Is this guy dumber than a bag of rocks, or what?
I canât even imagine that any judge would even entertain that sort of âdefenseâ. Looking forward to seeing how long these jackasses get to be guests of the state, or I guess in this case, the feds.
âBundyâs defense is expected to argue in court that Malheur was not federal land.â
Defense will also argue that Bundy was aboard Flight MH370 at the time of the takeover, that SCOTUS is composed of shape-shifting reptoids from Alpha Draconis, and that Hobby Lobby actually sells tasteful décor.
Oh, please do proceed, Mr. Bundy. OMG.
The prosecution will present their case.
The defense will present their case.
The judge will likely say, âYou know - you guys are right. The U.S. government doesnât actually exist, and has no authority over you, any land, or anything else. Therefore, you could not possibly have committed any crimes. Go, and enjoy the rest of your life.â
Yeah, thatâll happen.
âOnce statehood occurred for Oregon, Congress lost the right to own the land inside the state,â
Brilliant!
Why do we need laws and judges when there are brilliant Cornstitutional scholars like the Bundy Haploids walking among us?
On the other hand these ignorant fâcks not only are welfare parasites theyâre wasting other taxpayerâs money.
I hear Guantanamo has some vacancies, letâs give 'em a Cuban vacation!
this could actually be part of a brilliant legal strategy⊠if their attorneys go along with it then I suppose part of the appeal, after theyâre convicted, will be poor legal advice and representation for allowing the strategyâŠ
Well, Iâm on the edge of my seat just wondering what Rep. Michelle Fiore will say. Tell us, Michelle, does the federal government have jurisdiction over federal property?
Lauren Fox is waiting at the Tweet well for the tiniest drop of Fiore goodness.
NawwwwâŠ
They will claim that the judge, lawyers for the plaintiffs and jury either did not understand their Cornshitooshun or are completely un-Corshitooshinul to begin with.
One cannot have a logical conversation with three year olds.
Interesting argument counselor! Now the Court will be in recess so I can knit the fn rope!
All Rise!
In case anyone wondered, I checked and these guys claim to be real lawyers with all the trimmingsâlaw school, done cases, one was even an assistant district attorney for three years. All I can say is Iâve seen some real, live lawyers advance some very thin arguments as if they thought they were going to be taken seriously, but this is the thinnest by far. Itâs like Rube Goldberg well somebody anyway said, âNo matter how thin you slice it, itâs still baloney.â
âI say, I say sir, those Alpha Draconians are dangerous ruffians.â
Hope these smirking Daesh asswipes are ready for Leavenworth.