Discussion: Brownback Issues Order To Protect Religious Liberty After SCOTUS Ruling

Discussion for article #238229

Sam Brownshirt strikes again.

9 Likes

When will these talibangelical State governors realize that a State E. O. will never stand up in a Federal court?

20 Likes

First off Gov Brownshirt, the 1st Amendment protects your religious liberty. 2nd- the Freedom of Religion also means Freedom from Religion.
Lastly, NO ONE is taking your Religious Freedom away. I am sure most people don’t want to have your Religion rubbed in their face.

I would like to thank all of the lazy Democratic Voters and the US Supreme court for this “happy” set of circumstances.

6 Likes

Time for Sharia believers to start a solid campaign for establishment in all these red states.

10 Likes

Brownback — More like BROWNstreak from your BACKside —

2 Likes

Brownback–he never disappoints. ALWAYS a scumbag.

2 Likes

If you take state taxpayers’ money (whether as an adoption agency or other provider of services, or as a state employee), you work for everybody in the state. It’s really that simple.

If you are a group that wants to discriminate, stop taking state grants and payments. If you’re an individual who doesn’t want to provide services to gay folk or anybody else of whom you disapprove, find another job.

30 Likes

Best comment I’ve read lately? On The Guardian. With typical British understatement, instead of calling someone a douchebag, the commenter posted “He’s full of Massengil.”

6 Likes

Brownback has most likely been made aware of the likelihood his order will be smashed in court. But the bigots in his base of support want action, so he’s responding to their demands.

It buys him time while the GOP holdouts plot their next move. We’ll see lots more action in the run up to the 2016 election.

1 Like

Puritans haven’t improved over the centuries. They’re still after the freedom to judge, condemn, exclude, and generally bark out commandments telling everyone else what to do and how to live. Australia the penal colony received a more desirable class of rejects.

10 Likes

This religious freedom movement came too late for a generation of Americans. 50 years ago there would have been a great many business owners claiming an all white lunch counter was something their God commanded. Whether attributable to Biblical teachings or not, they could have asserted it was their sincerely held belief. These state laws don’t even require those objecting to gay marriage cite the basis for their religious objections. They merely have to say they believe it’s what the Bible teaches. And if it doesn’t? No matter.

6 Likes

Speaking of taxpayers’ money, isn’t it courageous brave for this statesman to take time out from his work on Kansas’ disastrous budget and waning economy to protect his constituents from this dire (albeit fictional) threat?

Gov. Brownback: Thank you for taking a moral stand in favor of treating some of your constituents as second-class citizens — and against dealing with more important issues. You, sir, are an inspiration to us all!

21 Likes

I would like to point out you are talking about Kansas here. It doesn’t matter how fired up Dems are, there simply aren’t enough of them. So don’t blame Democrats here. Blame the POS education system in Kansas that produces ignorant voters.

6 Likes

I’m still trying to convince my niece from Topeka that Lewis & Clark didn’t carve out the Grand Canyon.

7 Likes

The lamest thing about this particular order is that Brownback tailored it so narrowly that nobody could possibly invoke it to do anything remotely praiseworthy or worthwhile.

So a County Sheriff who really took the parable of the Sheep and the Goats seriously, (Matthew 25:31-46) couldn’t refuse to perform evictions and foreclosures, for example, out of his deeply personal, Biblical conviction that making people homeless would be the same as kicking out Jesus Christ, Himself.

8 Likes

And will also waste taxpayer money defending those EOs!

1 Like

Though Jesus listed his occupation as a carpenter, he was actually more active as a caterer, handing the wedding at Cana, feeding 3,000 in the wilderness and then feeding 5,000. None of these accounts mention him checking to see if any of the guests were gay. Is religious liberty really at risk in Kansas, or do we just have some fools demanding the right to hate? I would bet on the latter.

13 Likes

Puffing hard on the fading embers. Is there even smoke?

In the end, you can’t just make it up and call it ‘law’ and ‘liberty’. Though it does get you one more day on the front pages.

1 Like

Brownback should be forced to answer the question about the specific difference between Kansas EO 15-05 and Sharia law.

3 Likes