That graphic behind him says it all.
Russian propagandist will soon have unfettered access to 72% of the nation’s media markets.
“In terms of my analysis playing during your local news: as you can see, my segments are very clearly marked commentary,” he said of his segment, “Bottom Line with Boris.”
Your commentaries and those of others serving functions similar to you are but a small part of what people are objecting to, BORIS. Tell me this, were the "Don't pay attention to fake news" commentaries by local anchor teams prominently noted to viewers as scripts provided by Sinclair's corporate headquarters?“In July, Sinclair upped the number of “Bottom Line” segments its local news channels must run from three to nine a week.”
For propaganda to work properly, it must be presented often.
For propaganda to work properly, it must be presented often.
For propaganda to work properly, it must be presented often.
Yes, “Boris On Top” would definitely be a questionable claim.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if Boris’ conflicts are disclosed with a disclaimer every time he presents his “analysis”? You know, because he’s so interested in full disclosure and transparency and all. Merely marking them as “commentary” is not the issue – that’s not the same as clearly marking them with his conflicts.
Bottom with Boris is all I see… And really want to un-see.
Mr. Epshteyn does not know the difference between “commentary” and “facts.”
Sinclair needs to be slammed with the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Act. Buying up all local news outlets to the point of owning a vast majority of them and then using the platform to attack the remaining outlets in order to so damage them that they can be bought, absorbed and assimilated at a discount is clearly anti-competitive.
Anyone have the expertise to run this on Sinclair?
Yeah, it’s pretty funny. If the pic is small, all you get is “Bottom with Boris” (the “line” fades out…)
Maybe it’s subliminal advertising and he gets a kickback on butt implants from Boris Cosmetic…
Hehe,
Haaaaaaaahahahaha…those guys are idiots. Can they not see this?
Yuck yuck yuck!
Funny you mention it, because the starting still frame at which the video is frozen on my screen makes it look like he’s about to assume the position…hand wrapped around a dick and puckering up for it.
This guy is a dirty traitor if I’ve ever seen one.
Fish don’t know they’s wet.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
If you’re so inclined.
No, really, just sayin;…
Hey, I don’t read Playboy for the articles. OK?
How about those Yankees?
Boris, go back to Natasha in Russia!
LOL. No judgment intended, just objectively observing that the still frame does indeed give that impression (if you have a sick, immature, dirty mind like me).
Also too: YANKEES SUCK.