Discussion: Bobby Jindal Declined To Answer 'Hypothetical Question' On Iraq War

Discussion for article #236503

Jindal’s political strategy for the past 2 years is to observe whatever is getting conservatives in trouble, then after a few days of letting the issue simmer in the public consciousness, double down on it. It’s actually pretty funny, because he will do this no matter how pointless or stupid the issue is.

7 Likes

Hmmm … I was not aware that hindsight is actually ‘hypothetical.’ Derp.

6 Likes

Unless I’m mistaken, Bush brokered the deal that removed the troops from Iraq.

7 Likes

“Mr. Jindal, do you support hypothetical deception and pushing of a pro-war agenda based on manufactured reality by well-placed senior administration officials?” is a better question.

4 Likes

We should not play a parlor game focused on the wisdom of going to war, but the real parlor game claiming that the world is better with Sadam Husain dead is so much fun.

What a dweeb. You can’t answer a question using historical perspective but you can make claim about what might have been.

Given that much of The Islamic State’s military leadership would not have unemployed and radicalized had they still been in Sadam’s military, I am not sure Pyiush’s claim about a better, safer world is correct either.

4 Likes

Yep. Even if they think that there’s still time for the 2020 election, they STILL have no chance.

Ummm…

Ummmmmm…

Per, bobbi. “I don’t know what I am suppose to say. Let me check in with the koch bros.”

Let’s remember, the world is a better place without Saddam Hussein."

What possible metric could he use to back this absurdity up?

(Of course, it’s impossible to think that a MSM reporter could follow up with this question).

1 Like

Nothing stimulates thoughts of running for President like the alternative prospect of staying home and actually dealing with the $1.6 BILLION deficit you created as Governor.

See Christie, see Walker. Hell see Carly and her HP fiasco.

What a platform to convince the voters. Hey vote for me…I’ve created the largest deficit in the history of my state.

1 Like

Sorry, Bobby. If you want to even consider a Presidential run, you don’t get to set the terms of the debate. If you refuse to answer, you are unqualified before being out of the gate.

2 Likes

I suspect that his refusal to answer has something to do with the fact that he’s realized that the GOP is in between Scylla and Charybdis here. If they answer the answer that the Main Stream wants, the Base is going to get angry and if they answer the answer that the Base wants, the Main Stream will think they’re deaf to what’s bad in the country.

1 Like

But since O’Bummer carried it out, the fault for the war’s end is lain at his feet.

I’m just waiting for “G-d’s own” pie holes to blame the Usurper for misleading America on the “yellow cake” evidence :fish_cake:

1 Like

Yet again Jindal proves that it is possible to be a stupid party of one.

Rinse and his crew are going to have to rent a stadium big enough to hold the 20 or so candidates but with a stage big enough to hold the six or so people who’ll be in the audience. I’d rather watch the 20 noble beasts who ran in the Kentucky Derby than watch this gang, none of which will cross the finish line.

Louisiana should go back to electing smart, but crooked, governors, like the Longs and Edwin Walker. This election of a governor who might not be a lawbreaker but is demonstrably and consistently stupid , all the while lacking any wit or ability to be self -deprecating (unlike, say, Governor Earl Long, who, speaking to the Louisiana legislature after being discharged from a few days of involuntary commitment to a mental health facility, answered hecklers with, “I am the only person in this room who this week has been certified by doctors to be sane”) has made the state more of a laughing stock it has ever been. If it had the natural resources of Vermont, and not the Gulf, Louisiana’s venal and intellectually challenged politicians would be hard pressed to keep the state’s economy running better than that of, say, Chad.

1 Like

Louisiana has a huge film production industry, and the state basically subsidizes the film industry to make it more attractive to produce films there. State government takes a hit by its generous payments to the film industry but it outpaces California and New York in the number of films produced. One can foresee Jindal pointing to this as his major accomplishment.

Isn’t it called begging the question, if that means assuming a conclusion?

Obama withdrew troops from Iraq not without a status of forces agreement, but in compliance with a status of forces agreement. Jindal is just wrong. To say he’s lying would imply he’s smart enough to know what actually happened.

He may be dim, but at least he’s timid.