Care to put that in English after the speed’s worn off?
And that is not at all relevant or applicable to the Clinton email non-treversy.
It is “relevant” since the very claim rests on her as an elite who is using her emails in a way that will threaten oversight. Thus, we have to refute the claim on the merits. Easily done, of course. Him bring up economic issues doesn’t do that. If the merits are right, they touch upon one of his primary concerns.
More “elitist” woo.