Maybe he was addressing a question he was asked?
Just a thought.
Maybe he was addressing a question he was asked?
Just a thought.
Again, what is with comments like âthe likes of Bernie Sandersâ? What is with you people?
There is some source of baseless negative attacks out there. Are you doing this consciously or have you just been swept up with the nonsense?
From the article:
Then, on Wednesday, Politico shared a story on Wednesday by tweeting, âCentrists are coming around to Elizabeth Warren as an alternative to Bernie Sanders,â
How is this âbsâ? Iâm not following your argument. You assert the point that centrists are supporting Warren (or, at the very least, playing up her chances), but you call it âbsâ when Sanders says exactly the same thing??
The article overstates the facts. Warren and Sanders made an publicized agreement. Because something is unpublicized doesnât make it secret.
BS because he said it was a conspiracy. Why canât Third Way support Warren because they really like her, even if they disagree with her on some issues? As if only Saint Bernard is allowed to be attractive.
I hope youâre wrong.
Itâs not a secret any more.
Where and when?
His tweet âThe cat is out of the bag. The corporate wing of the Democratic Party is publicly âanybody but Bernie.â They know our progressive agenda of Medicare for All, breaking up big banks, taking on drug companies and raising wages is the real threat to the billionaire class.â
With that POLITICO article about Warren attached.
The Sanders bashing reminds me too much of Daily Kos in 2016. I was a very early joiner there and quit mid-2016 and Iâve never been back.
Heretofore I am going to quit reading anything on TPM about Sanders because it brings out those who cannot see the forest for the trees. Or maybe it brings out those infamous people/forces who are trying to interfere with our elections. Either way, we need to quit internecine squabbling and focus on the real catastrophe: Trump. I will vote for whoever runs against him. Period. And withhold sniping at other candidates, especially when substantive issues are not being discussed.
and the notion that the candidates shouldnât actually compete strikes me as bizarre.
Youâre right and they will compete but w/o making it ugly. They both understand that one or the other has to win the WH in order to change the conversation and bring their message to Washington. And NY Magazine can play the gossip game as well as any publication. Put NY in front of a magazine publication and people tend to think âserious journalismâ and must be âbeyond reproachâ.
Good. But I expect this will be part of R[ussia]T[oday]'s next âWhat about?â headline when we commemorate the 80th anniversary of the Hitler-Stalin non-aggression pact.
Bernie & Warren are close enough to each other policy-wise that it makes sense they would need to be careful about attacking each other. Most policy-based attacks could be reused by the GOP in the general.
Of course, âcloseâ doesnât mean âidentical,â and I think there are legitimate policy reasons to prefer the one over the other. I hope this agreement of theirs doesnât deprive primary voters of the opportunity to see those differences contrasted.
You wrote that Sanders called something a âconspiracy.â My question was about your assertion.
Well, the ThirdWay said they might support Warren and then Sanders said the corporate wing was undermining his progressive agenda. Did he have to write âconspiracyâ explicitly?
They really donât like her. They criticized Warren in 2013.
Third Wayâs Kessler said they endorse anyone but Bernie. Bernie shot back at Third Way in his tweetâŚ
Hereâs Sanders on the subject:
âThat tweet was not about Elizabeth Warren at all. Not at all. Elizabeth is a friend of mine, and weâre going to run what I hope are issue-oriented campaigns," Sanders told CNNâs Chris Cuomo on âCuomo Primetime.â
âThis was though, a very strong statement about a group called Third Way, and you know that Third Way is the corporatist wing of the Democratic Party,â he continued.
If you claim he said it, Iâd like to see where.
If he made no such claim and itâs merely your attempt at paraphrase, thatâs fine.
Not in 2013 but maybe in 2020. If you wanna take Sandersâ words literally, then apply the same standard to everyone else, including ThirdWay.
But this agreement does not apply to hack pundits making up fake quotes and turning them into headlines, unfortunately.
Check out this sleazy hackery from Vanity Fair.
This is the headline : âSANDERS: WARREN IS SURGING BECAUSE SHEâS GOT OVARIESâ
What Bernie actually said:
âI think that there are a certain number of people who would like to see a woman elected, and I understand that,â Sanders said. âThere are people who would like to see somebody who is younger, and I understand that also. There are a lot of factors out there.â
Weâll be seeing tons of this garbage.
The Bernie Bros didnât get the message. They are beating Warren down relentlessly.