Discussion for article #241632
There is a God!
Now we shall see if the MSM will give this the coverage it deserves!!
Its time to investigate the investigation.
the staffer was fired in part because “he himself manifested improper partiality and animus in his investigative work,” including toward Clinton.
In other words, because he refused to go along with the GOP smear job on Hillary. Impartiality =/= im’(proper)partiality.
I love that the Repubs are saying they fired him because he had too much animus against Hillary.
Yeah, I’ll buy that for a dollar…
House of cards. No, not the Kevin Spacey kind, the Joe Pesci kind.
Is the Good Ship Dowdy sinking? Or just leaking, again?
How can this be?
We were told by McCarthy (in his walk-back attempts after accidentally telling the truth), and the entire GOP, that the work Gowdy and this committee were doing was beyond reproach.
Guess that utterance by McCarthy was not meant to be a factual statement.
(wry grin)
The unraveling continues.
Boyo, that’ll make a good ad for Clinton come next summer, eh?
Stupid fucks fucked themselves.
…and a hearty Tea-Freakin’Hee to the House -Trasher-Juveniles…
may the plot continue to thicken to depth of their malignorance…!
Lordy, how many shoes can drop? Is Dubya nearby? Can a misuse of government suit be filed?
Sounds like the Times is beginning to try to atone for their participation in the smear Hillary campaign?
A win for the gaffer!
TPM:
In a statement to the Times, the select committee denied Podliska’s allegations and countered that the staffer was fired in part because “he himself manifested improper partiality and animus in his investigative work,” including toward Clinton.
Glad to see the GOP resorting to its usual “No, you are!” defense.
Projection: It’s not just a booth in theater.
Next up on our broadcast we have Sonny Boy Williamson with some thoughts on what happens when you start people talking…
Look at CNN, committing journalism. Good. Except, it was pretty clear that the committee was a fishing expedition to bring down HRC from the beginning. But better late than never.
CNN is calling the guy a disgruntled ex-staffer, and acting shocked that anyone would consider the Benghazi Investigations politicaly motivated.