Yeah, that’s what I always tell the Ethics and Compliance guys. “Probably” the right thing to follow their explicit, written, specific guidance. Or not … who knows?
Probably?
Talk about using weasel words…
It would be totally inappropriate for Barr to state conclusively when he was not party to the discussions. But I’m comforted by the fact that angry people on the internet can find fault with the word “probably”.
Such pure farce. Let’s just get to the real question: will Fat Fuck Barr beat racist Jeff Sessions’ perjuries during his confirmation, or will he wuss out and tell less?
If…then probably…
A lotta waffley language. Hopefully, this guy isn’t being appointed to some sort of job where he’ll need to be specific about legal matters.
Probably? I think I’d like to see the statistical math.
This is a softball question, because both of them are ignoring that it’s not just working on trump’s campaign, it’s repeatedly lying to the senate about his part (contacts with the russian government) in exactly the matter being investigated.
Audience of 1 ! (Individual-1 )
I trust this bastard like boa constrictor in a baby’s crib.
Mr. Barr, it’s probably the right thing for you to not be confirmed.
Once again, Trump ought to be wondering what the fuck Graham is doing right now…